PubMed · 13482636
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L REVILLA AHUMADA, M SORIANO CASTILLO, E GIRELA RIAZZO. 1957. [Auricular flutter].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13482636/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A rare case of clinical cardiac arrest after acute DC cardioversion is presented. The patient was a 64-year-old man with acute haemodynamically unstable atrial flutter. He was known to have had episodes of atrial flutter requiring DC cardioversion, and he was treated with propafenone (300 mg twice daily). Synchronised DC cardioversion resulted in cardiac arrest. Resuscitation was initiated and after 2-3 minutes the patient regained sinus rhythm and pulse. There were no sequelae. We conclude that cardiac arrest is a rare complication to DC cardioversion.
The most widely accepted criterion for successful radiofrequency catheter (RFC) ablation of typical atrial flutter is the development of bi-directional isthmus block. In a subset of patients, conventional RFC ablation fails to achieve this endpoint because deeper and wider lesions are required. We investigated the efficacy of a long 8-mm tip catheter in these cases. One hundred and seventy-four consecutive patients (137 male; 61 +/- 9 years) with recurrent typical atrial flutter underwent conventional RFC ablation first with a standard 4 mm tip catheter. In resistant cases (n = 52), ablation was continued using a large tip 8-mm catheter when the 4-mm tip catheter failed. Resistant atrial flutter was identified when 21 RFC pulses failed to reach the selected endpoint of bi-directional isthmus block or in cases of transient bi- directional block (at least 3 episodes). In 122 of the 174 patients (70%) conventional atrial flutter ablation was successfully performed with 13 +/- 5 RFC applications. In the remaining 52 subjects (30%), the ablation procedure was completed using the large tip electrode catheter. In 30 of these 52 patients (58%), the catheter was changed because of persistent intra-atrial conduction after 21 RFC pulses and in 22 (42%) because of intermittent conduction block after 11 +/- 5 applications. Using the large tip electrode catheter, the selected endpoint was achieved in all patients of both groups with 3 +/- 2 RFC pulses (power output of 50-60 W, pulse duration of 60 sec). No post-procedure complications were observed. After 15 +/- 5 months of follow-up, 16 patients (9%) had recurrence of atrial flutter. Five of the patients had been in the resistant group. In patients with atrial flutter resistant to conventional ablation therapy, the long tip (8-mm) catheter appears to be a safe and effective alternative to use of the conventional 4-mm tip catheter.
The cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is a slow conduction area in the circuit of typical atrial flutter. However, conventional methods are limited by the inaccuracy of measurements of distance on the surface of the heart. The aim of the study was to define the conduction properties of the atrial flutter circuit along the tricuspid annulus by using a three-dimensional noncontact mapping system. In 34 atrial flutter patients (30 men, 4 women; mean age 54 +/- 14; 27 counter-clockwise, 4 clockwise, and 3 both), a noncontact multielectrode array was used to reconstruct electrograms in the right atrium. Isochronal and isopotential propagation mapping was performed during atrial flutter. The conduction velocity was calculated by dividing conduction time by surface distance. The right atrium along the tricuspid annulus was divided into five regions: lateral wall, superior right atrium, septum, septal CTI, and lateral CTI. Conduction velocities were 0.99 +/- 0.85, 1.67 +/- 1.21, 1.58 +/- 1.05, 0.82 +/- 0.72, and 1.68 +/- 1.00 m/s in counter-clockwise and 0.81 +/- 0.71, 2.61 +/- 1.90, 1.52 +/- 0.91, 0.91 +/- 0.80 and 1.91 +/- 0.83 m/s in clockwise, respectively. Conduction velocities were significantly slower in the septal CTI and lateral wall than in the lateral CTI, the septum, and the superior right atrium (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found between the septal CTI and the lateral wall. Conduction within the septal CTI was slower in patients treated with antiarrhythmic agents than in untreated patients (P < 0.05). The septal part of the CTI (but not the lateral CTI) and the lateral wall are slow conduction zones in the atrial flutter circuit, and both may, therefore, be mechanically important for the development of atrial flutter.