PubMed · 13415341
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1957-01-31. [Renal osteodystrophy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13415341/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Despite the enormous cardiovascular disease epidemic and poor survival among individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), traditional risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and obesity appear not as relevant as was previously thought, nor would their management improve survival in patients with CKD who are undergoing dialysis. On the contrary, kidney disease wasting (KDW) (also known as the malnutrition-inflammation complex), renal anemia, and kidney bone disease (KBD) appear to be the 3 most important nontraditional risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease in CKD. KBD-associated hyperparathyroidism may contribute to worsening refractory anemia and KDW/inflammation. The main cause of secondary hyperparathyroidism is active vitamin D deficiency. Hence, treatment of patients with KBD with vitamin D analogs, especially those with lesser effects on calcium and phosphorus such as paricalcitol, may be the most promising option for improving CKD outcomes. By conducting survival analyses in a 2-year (7/2001 to 6/2003) cohort of 58,058 patients on hemodialysis, we recently found that associations between high serum parathyroid hormone and increased death risk were masked by the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, and that alkaline phosphatase had an incremental association with mortality. Administration of paricalcitol was associated with improved survival in time-varying models. We now present additional subgroup analyses that show that administration of any dose of paricalcitol, when compared with no paricalcitol, is associated with better likelihood of survival in virtually all subgroups of patients on hemodialysis. Because these associations may be secondary to bias by indication, randomized clinical trials are necessary to verify the findings of this and similar observational studies.
BACKGROUND: Variability among assays used to measure intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) is of particular concern because of the routine use of iPTH assay results to guide management of osteodystrophy and calcium metabolism in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which results from commercially available iPTH assays diverge from results obtained with the Nichols Allegro(R) Intact PTH immunoradiometric assay (IRMA), which was used as evidence in the development of the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines. METHODS: We divided EDTA plasma from 46 dialysis patients with ESRD and measured iPTH values with the following commercially available iPTH assays: Nichols' Allegro iPTH IRMA, Nichols Advantage iPTH immunochemiluminescent assay (ICMA), Scantibodies' Total Intact PTH IRMA, DiaSorin's N-tact iPTH IRMA, DPC's Coat-A-Count iPTH IRMA, Roche's Elecsys iPTH ICMA, and DSL's Active iPTH IRMA. RESULTS: Method comparison showed considerable interassay differences in the measurement of iPTH in ESRD patients. IPTH values assessed by other methods ranged, on average, from 60% to 152% of the Nichols Allegro IRMA values. Of the 6 iPTH assays tested, only the Scantibodies Total Intact PT IRMA (P = 0.7554) and the Roche Elecsys iPTH ICMA (P = 0.1327) resulted in iPTH values not statistically different from those obtained with the Nichols Allegro iPTH IRMA. CONCLUSIONS: Noncomparability among iPTH assays remains a distinct problem for the management of ESRD patients. These results should be taken into consideration when determining the course of medical treatment based on measured iPTH concentrations.
Disturbances in mineral and bone metabolism are prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and are an important cause of morbidity, decreased quality of life, and extraskeletal calcification that have been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. These disturbances have traditionally been termed renal osteodystrophy and classified based on bone biopsy. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) sponsored a Controversies Conference on Renal Osteodystrophy to (1) develop a clear, clinically relevant, and internationally acceptable definition and classification system, (2) develop a consensus for bone biopsy evaluation and classification, and (3) evaluate laboratory and imaging markers for the clinical assessment of patients with CKD. It is recommended that (1) the term renal osteodystrophy be used exclusively to define alterations in bone morphology associated with CKD, which can be further assessed by histomorphometry, and the results reported based on a unified classification system that includes parameters of turnover, mineralization, and volume, and (2) the term CKD-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) be used to describe a broader clinical syndrome that develops as a systemic disorder of mineral and bone metabolism due to CKD, which is manifested by abnormalities in bone and mineral metabolism and/or extra-skeletal calcification. The international adoption of these recommendations will greatly enhance communication, facilitate clinical decision-making, and promote the evolution of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines worldwide.