Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 13330051

[Bilateral bundle branch block].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J LAHAM. 1956. [Bilateral bundle branch block].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13330051/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pathophysiological mechanisms of Brugada syndrome: depolarization disorder, repolarization disorder, or more?

After its recognition as a distinct clinical entity, Brugada syndrome is increasingly recognized worldwide as an important cause of sudden cardiac death. Brugada syndrome exhibits autosomal dominant inheritance with SCN5A, which encodes the cardiac sodium channel, as the only gene with a proven involvement in 20-30% of patients. Its signature feature is ST segment elevation in right precordial ECG leads and predisposition to malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The pathophysiological mechanism of ST elevation and ventricular tachyarrhythmia, two phenomena strongly related, is controversial. Here, we review clinical and experimental studies as they provide evidence to support or disprove the two hypotheses on the mechanism of Brugada syndrome that currently receive the widest support: (1) nonuniform abbreviation of right ventricular epicardial action potentials ("repolarization disorder"), (2) conduction delay in the right ventricular outflow tract ("depolarization disorder"). We also propose a schematic representation of the depolarization disorder hypothesis. Moreover, we review recent evidence to suggest that other derangements may also contribute to the pathophysiology of Brugada syndrome, in particular, right ventricular structural derangements. In reviewing these studies, we conclude that, similar to most diseases, it is likely that Brugada syndrome is not fully explained by one single mechanism. Rather than adhering to the notion that Brugada syndrome is a monofactorial disease, we should aim for clarification of the contribution of various pathophysiological mechanisms in individual Brugada syndrome patients and tailor therapy considering each of these mechanisms.

Bundle-Branch Block↗

Brugada syndrome.

The Brugada syndrome is an autosomal dominant disease with incomplete penetrance that may cause syncope and sudden cardiac death in young individuals with a normal heart. It is characterized by an electrocardiographic pattern of complete or incomplete right bundle branch block and ST segment elevation in leads V1-V3. One of the genes linked to this syndrome is SCN5A, the gene encoding for the cardiac sodium channel. Mutations in SCN5A cause a functional reduction in the availability of cardiac sodium current in Brugada syndrome. However, only 20-25% of patients affected by this syndrome have mutations on this gene. A novel gene locus on chromosome 3, distinct from SCN5A, has been identified recently. The relative male preponderance of the phenotype, despite equal inheritance of the gene in males and females, has led to the speculation of a role for testosterone in the phenotype. The disease could manifest at first time as cardiac arrest without any previous symptom, and the electrocardiographic pattern could be intermittent, requiring a pharmacological challenge with Class I antiarrhythmic drugs to unmask ST elevation. Several conditions producing Brugada-like electrocardiographic patterns should be borne in mind and excluded while making a diagnosis of the Brugada syndrome. The management is difficult as pharmacological agents are not universally effective. The mode of treatment recommended by the majority of cardiac electrophysiologists is the implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator. Symptomatic patients with inducible ventricular arrhythmias and a positive family history should be considered for prophylactic implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator.

Bundle-Branch Block↗