PubMed · 13217152
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B V PROTOPOPOV, A N DOBROTINA. [Higher nervous function tests in glaucoma].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13217152/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The 90 kDa ribosomal S6 serine/threonine kinase 2 gene (RSK2, U08316) has been recently identified as a disease-causing gene in an X-linked disorder, the Coffin-Lowry Syndrome (MIM 303600) characterized by severe mental retardation, facial dysmorphisms and progressive skeletal malformations. To investigate its possible role in cerebral cortex development, we performed RNA in situ hybridization at three stages of human development: day 32 (Carnegie 15), 9 weeks (Carnegie 23) and 13 weeks. RSK2 expression is detected in the embryonic anterior and posterior telencephalon (hippocampus anlagen), mesencephalon, rhombencephalon and cerebellum. RSK2 gene expression is also observed in dorsal root ganglia, cranial nerve ganglia, and sensory epithelium of the inner ear, liver, lung and jaw anlagen. This pattern of expression may be involved in cognitive impairment and facial dysmorphisms found in Coffin-Lowry Syndrome.
In most motor acts, posture and movement must be coordinated in order to achieve the goal of the task. The focus of this chapter is on why and how this coordination takes place. First, the nature of posture is discussed. Two of its general functions are recognized; an antigravity role, and a role in interfacing the body with its environment such that perception and action can ensue. Next addressed is how posture is controlled centrally. Two models are presented and evaluated; a genetic and a hierarchical one. The latter has two levels; internal representation and execution. Finally, we consider how central control processes might achieve an effective coordination between posture and movement. Is a single central control process responsible for both movement and its associated posture? Alternatively, is there a dual coordinated control system: one for movement, and the other for posture? We provide evidence for the latter, in the form of a biomechanical analysis that features the use of eigenmovement approach.