PubMed · 13213398
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E S HUGHES. 1954-10-16. Caecostomy.. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1954.tb66988.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The authors describe their experience with a series of 11 patients in whom they have carried out Chait cecostomy catheter insertion into a laparoscopically formed appendicostomy. This technique has several advantages compared with percutaneous insertion and we now insert the device at the primary procedure. The authors have had one minor complication in their 11 patients, with mean follow-up of 8 months. This technique is recommended for the management of refractory constipation, for etiologies including spina bifida, anorectal malformation, distal intestinal obstruction syndrome, and slow-colonic transit.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit of antegrade enemas in children with severe constipation who were referred to a tertiary care center. METHODS: From 1997 to 1999, 12 children (9 male, aged 8.7 +/- 4.4 years) underwent cecostomy placement. All children were neurologically normal and had been extensively examined to rule out organic causes of constipation. Follow-up included a questionnaire to interview caregivers 13.1 +/- 8.5 months after cecostomy placement. RESULTS: For all children, antegrade enemas led to improvement in the number of bowel movements / week (7.1 versus 1.4, P < 0.005), number of soiling accidents / week (1.0 versus 4.7, P < 0.01), abdominal pain score (0.9 versus 2.9, P < 0.005), emotional health score (3.6 versus 1.9, P < 0.005), overall health score (3.6 versus 1.7, P < 0.005), number of medications used for constipation (0.8 versus 4.0, P < 0.005), number of missed school days / month (1.5 versus 7.5, P < 0.02), and number of physician office visits / year (9.2 versus 24.0, P < 0.05). Irrigation solutions used for the antegrade enemas included polyethylene glycol (67%), saline and glycerin solution (25%), and phosphate enema (8%), administered everyday in seven children and every other day in five children. Adverse events included skin breakdown and granulation tissue in one patient, leakage of irrigation solution in one patient, and dislodging of the tube in two patients. Five patients discontinued the use of antegrade enemas within a mean of 14.6 +/- 9.1 months after beginning treatment. CONCLUSION: Antegrade enemas through a cecostomy are a safe and satisfactory option for children who are neurologically intact and who have severe constipation that does not respond to medical treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the effects of an antegrade continence enema stoma formed in a paraplegic man with intractable constipation and fecal incontinence. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Spinal cord injury unit, Veterans Affairs hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Spinal cord injury (SCI) patient with T12 paraplegia. INTERVENTION: Surgical formation of antegrade continence enema stoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time of bowel program care, ease of fecal elimination, safety of procedure. RESULTS: Bowel care time was decreased from 2 hours to 50 minutes daily; 6 bowel medications were discontinued; fecal incontinence was eliminated; and no surgical or medical side effects noted after the procedure. CONCLUSION: The antegrade continence enema procedure is a safe and effective means of treating intractable constipation and fecal incontinence in the adult SCI patient. This option should be considered for those persons in whom medical management of bowel care has been unsuccessful.