PubMed · 13196591
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H PFISTERER. 1954. [Comments on preceding article].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13196591/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: Prostatic calculi are common but little is known of their effect on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). We investigated whether prostatic calculi might influence serum PSA in men with clinically undetectable prostatic cancer or prostatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 1999 and November 2001, 581 consecutive patients underwent serum PSA determination and digital rectal examination. Of these patients 486 without detectable prostatic cancer, or a history or symptoms of prostatitis and with other specified exclusion criteria were included in the study. The detection and volume measurement of prostatic calculi, and the measurement of prostate volume were performed by transrectal ultrasonography. RESULTS: Prostatic calculi were detected in 198 of the 486 men (40.7%). Mean patient age, prostate volume and serum PSA were not significantly different in men with and without prostatic calculi. Prostate volume was significantly greater in patients with abnormally elevated serum PSA than in those with normal levels. However, no significant difference was found between the percent of men with prostatic calculi or the volumes of prostatic calculi in the 2 groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the presence or volume of prostatic calculi was not a risk factor for elevated PSA. Multivariate analysis showed that age and prostate volume were associated with elevated PSA. CONCLUSIONS: The presence or volume of prostatic calculi had no significant effect on serum PSA. Our results suggest that the influence of prostatic calculi is irrelevant in men with elevated PSA.
Pain is the dominant clinical problem in patients with chronic pancreatitis. It can be due to pseudocysts, as well as strictures and stones in the pancreatic ducts. Most experts agree that obstruction could cause increased pressure within the main pancreatic duct or its branches, resulting in pain. Endoscopic therapy aims to alleviate pain by reducing the pressure within the ductal system and draining pseudocysts. Approaches vary according to the specific nature of the problem, and include transgastric, transduodenal and transpapillary stenting and drainage. Additional techniques for the removal of stones from the pancreatic duct include extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Success rates for stone extraction and stenting of strictures are high in specialized centres that employ experienced endoscopists, but pain often recurs during long term follow-up. Complications include pancreatitis, bleeding, infection and perforation. In the case of pancreatic pseudocysts, percutaneous or even surgical drainage should be considered if septae or large amounts of debris are present within the lesion. This article describes the techniques, indications and results of endoscopic therapy of pancreatic lesions.
Endoscopic therapy can be used to dilate strictures in the pancreatic duct, remove stones and drain pseudocysts. In addition, it provides an alternative to surgery for the management of pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Pain is a difficult problem in these patients, especially if substance abuse is present, and its medical management is generally unsatisfactory. The concept that pancreatic pain is related to increased pressure in the main pancreatic duct is unproven, and is not supported by the results of surgical intervention. Although pancreatic stenting is often technically successful at achieving drainage of the pancreatic duct and relieving pain over the short term, pain usually recurs with time, complications are frequent, and repeated stent changes are usually necessary. Pancreatic pseudocysts can be drained endoscopically, using transpapillary, cystogastrostomy or cystoduodenostomy approaches, but success rates are less than 50% and bleeding is a major complication. Pseudocysts should not be drained unless they are symptomatic, causing complications or enlarging. There have been no published studies comparing endoscopic with surgical or radiological modalities. Endoscopic therapy of pancreatic disorders is a new and interesting technique, but initial promising results need to be confirmed in large, well-designed clinical trials. Such studies would need to enrol large numbers of patients, and involve measurement of technical success, pain severity and quality of life parameters. At present, endoscopic techniques must be considered experimental.