Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 13188773

[Lupus carcinoma].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

X VILANOVA, L ALVARADO, F GRIMALT. 1954. [Lupus carcinoma].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13188773/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Gastric amphicrine carcinoma in the stomach: an unexpected presentation of MUTYH-associated polyposis.

Amphicrine carcinomas of the stomach, defined by dual exocrine and neuroendocrine differentiation within the same neoplastic cell, are exceedingly rare. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple colorectal adenomas and variable upper gastrointestinal involvement; however, amphicrine carcinomas have not been previously documented in this setting. We report a gastric amphicrine carcinoma arising in the background of extensive fundic gland polyposis in a patient with MAP. Endoscopy revealed a 3.5-cm flat elevated lesion in the gastric fundus amid extensive fundic gland polyposis. Histologically, the tumor consisted of a single population of cells exhibiting combined glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation without zonal or biphasic architecture, and many of these cells demonstrated true amphicrine morphology. Immunohistochemistry confirmed co-expression of cytokeratin and the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin in the same cell population. Germline targeted next-generation sequencing identified biallelic MUTYH variants in trans (c.733C>T, p.Arg245Cys [likely pathogenic]; c.842C>T, p.Ala281Val [variant of uncertain significance]), supporting a diagnosis of MAP. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a gastric amphicrine carcinoma in a MAP patient, expanding the spectrum of MAP-associated upper gastrointestinal neoplasia and underscoring the importance of vigilant endoscopic surveillance in hereditary polyposis syndromes.

Carcinoma↗

Methylation of the retinoid response gene TIG1 in prostate cancer correlates with methylation of the retinoic acid receptor beta gene.

Methylation of CpG islands and associated gene silencing may lead to malignant progression, but the mechanisms of CpG island methylation in cancer are unknown. The tazarotene-induced gene 1 (TIG1), also known as retinoid acid (RA) receptor-responsive 1 gene was first identified as an RA-responsive gene and was shown to be downregulated in prostate cancer. Here, we show that this downregulation is caused by the methylation of the promoter and CpG island of TIG1. TIG1 was methylated in 26 of 50 (52%) primary prostate cancers, but was not methylated in normal tissues or benign hyperplasias. Three of four tumors that metastasized, five of six that were poorly differentiated and all that were assigned a Gleason score higher than 8 (7/7) were methylated in the promoter of TIG1. The samples with peripheral invasion were more frequently methylated (21/32, 66%) than tissues without peripheral invasion (5/18, 28%). In addition, Gleason 7-10 cancers (21/30, 70%) were significantly more frequently methylated compared with Gleason 4-6 cancers (4/18, 22%) (P<0.01). The retinoic acid receptor beta (RAR-beta) gene was frequently methylated as well (42/50, 84%). When TIG1 showed methylation, RAR-beta was also methylated (25/26 samples). In almost all samples where RAR-beta was not methylated, TIG1 was also in an unmethylated state (14/15 samples). The methylation of TIG1 and RAR-beta was positively correlated (r=0.35; P=0.017). It is possible that the methylation of the retinoid response gene TIG1 occurred in response to the methylation and inactivation of RAR-beta. These observations may contribute to our understanding of mechanistic events leading to CpG island methylation in cancer.

Carcinoma↗

Changes in biophysical parameters of plasma membranes influence cisplatin resistance of sensitive and resistant epidermal carcinoma cells.

The mechanism of resistance of cancer cells to the anticancer drug cisplatin is not fully understood. Using cisplatin-sensitive KB-3-1 and -resistant KCP-20 cells, we found that the resistant cells have higher membrane potential, as determined by membrane potential sensing oxonol dye. Electron spin resonance and fluorescence polarization studies revealed that the resistant cells have more "fluid" plasma membranes than the sensitive cells. Because of this observed difference in membrane "fluidity," we attempted modification of the plasma membrane fluidity by the incorporation of heptadecanoic acid into KB-3-1 and KCP-20 cell membranes. We found that such treatment resulted in increased heptadecanoic acid content and increased fluidity in the plasma membranes of both cell types, and also resulted in increased cisplatin resistance in the KCP-20 cells. This finding is in accord with our results, which showed that the cisplatin-resistant KCP-20 cells have more fluid membranes than the cisplatin-sensitive KB-3-1 cells. It remains to be determined whether the observed differences in biophysical status and/or fatty acid composition alone, or the secondary effect of these differences on the structure or function of some transmembrane protein(s), is the reason for increased cisplatin resistance.

Carcinoma↗