Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1288008

Visual processing of optic acceleration.

P Werkhoven·H P Snippe·A Toet
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present data on the human sensitivity to optic acceleration, i.e. temporal modulations of the speed and direction of moving objects. Modulation thresholds are measured as a function of modulation frequency and speed for different periodical velocity vector modulation functions using a localized target. Evidence is presented that human detection of velocity vector modulations is not directly based on the acceleration signal (the temporal derivative of the velocity vector modulation). Instead, modulation detection is accurately described by a two-stage model: a low-pass temporal filter transformation of the true velocity vector modulation followed by a variance detection stage. A functional description of the first stage is a second order low-pass temporal filter having a characteristic time constant of 40 msec. In effect, the temporal low-pass filter is an integration of the velocity vector modulation within a temporal window of 100-140 msec. A non-trivial link of this low-pass filter stage to the temporal characteristics of standard motion detection mechanisms will be discussed. Velocity vector modulations are detected in the second-stage, whenever the variance of the filtered velocity vector exceeds a certain threshold variance in either the speed or direction dimension. The threshold standard deviations for this variance detection stage are estimated to be 17% for speed modulations and 9% for motion direction modulations.

Explore related subjects

Fixation, OcularHumansMathematicsModels, NeurologicalMotion PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualSensory ThresholdsTime FactorsJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Werkhoven, H P Snippe, A Toet. 1992. Visual processing of optic acceleration.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(92)90095-z

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals.

To determine the location of visual objects relative to the observer, the visual system must take account not only of the location of the stimulus on the retina, but also of the direction of gaze. In contrast, the perceived spatial relationship between visual stimuli is normally assumed to depend on retinal information alone, and not to require information about eye position. We now show, however, that the perceived alignment of three dots-tested by a vernier alignment task-is systematically altered in the period immediately preceding a saccade. Thus, information about eye position can modify not only the perceived relationship of the entire retinal image to the observer, but also the relations between elements within the image. The processing of relative position and of egocentric (observer-centred) position may therefore be less distinct than previously believed.

Fixation, Ocular↗
PubMed1997

Smooth-pursuit eye movements elicited by first-order and second-order motion.

The perception of the displacement of luminance-defined contours (i.e., first-order motion) is an important and well-examined function of the visual system. It can be explained, for example, by the operation of elementary motion detectors (EMDs), which cross-correlate the spatiotemporal luminance distribution. More recent studies using second-order motion stimuli, i.e., shifts of the distribution of features such as contrast, texture, flicker, or motion, extended classic concepts of motion perception by including nonlinear or hierarchical processing in the EMD. Smooth-pursuit eye movements can be used as a direct behavioral probe for motion processing. The ability of the visual system to extract motion signals from the spatiotemporal changes of the retinal image can be addressed by analyzing the elicited eye movements. We measured the eye movement response to moving objects defined by two different types of first-order motion and two different types of second-order motion. Our results clearly showed that the direction of smooth-pursuit eye movements was always determined by the direction of object motion. In particular, in the case of second-order motion stimuli, smooth-pursuit did not follow the retinal image motion. The latency of the initial saccades during pursuit of second-order stimuli was slightly but significantly increased, compared with the latency of saccades elicited by first-order motion. The processing of second-order motion in the peripheral visual field was less exact than the processing of first-order motion in the peripheral field. Steady state smooth-pursuit eye speed did not reflect the velocity of second-order motion as precisely as that of first-order motion, and the resulting retinal error was compensated by saccades. Interestingly, for slow second-order stimuli we observed that the eye could move faster than the target, leading to small, corrective saccades in the opposite direction to the ongoing smooth-pursuit eye movement. We conclude from our results that both visual perception and the control of smooth-pursuit eye movements have access to processing mechanisms extracting first- and second-order motion.

Fixation, Ocular↗
PubMed1997

Saccadic suppression of displacement: separate influences of saccade size and of target retinal eccentricity.

The threshold for detection of displacements of visual objects is higher during voluntary saccades than it is during steady gaze ("saccadic suppression of displacement"; SSD). Relative contributions to SSD of extraretinal and retinal factors were investigated by measuring displacement thresholds in four experiments in which three observers judged whether a test flash, presented after a saccade or a period of fixation, was located to the left or right of a reference point viewed earlier. The experiments, involving saccades ranging from 4 to 12 deg in length, separated the effects of saccade size from the effects of retinal eccentricity of the reference point, and also separated the effects of retinal eccentricity of the test flash from both. The influences of the three are nearly linearly independent. Approximately 20% of the total influence on SSD derives from retinal influences of test flash and reference point; 80% is due to extraretinal influence associated with saccade size. A signal/noise model that accounted well for our previous on SSD (Li & Matin, 1990a,b) was extended to account for the present results. The model also provides a unified treatment of SSD and of the saccadic suppression of visibility (SSV).

Fixation, Ocular↗