Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12875350

Understanding and using diagnostic tests.

Abstract

Every diagnostic test causes additional cost if not additional risk. The cost and risk are justified if the test result is likely to change what is done for patients. This includes a diagnostic test that does not alter therapy but provides important prognostic information for the parents. Whether the test result changes therapy depends on: the action threshold (the probability of disease at which the clinician offers the therapy or intervention because it would do more good than harm). the patient's pretest probability of disease. the test performance (measured by LRs, sensitivity, and specificity). For all tests there is an inverse relationship or trade-offbetween sensitivity and specificity. A good diagnostic test is one in which this trade-off is relatively small within the range of sensitivities and specificities that are clinically relevant. When diagnostic tests are used in low-risk subjects (as in screening tests), the performance of the test is critical because missing a significant number of cases is considered unacceptable and subjecting healthy individuals to the repercussions of false-positive test results is also problematic. The decision to introduce a screening program also depends on the availability and cost of screening and diagnostic tests, the potential for testing to cause harm, the prevalence and prognosis of the condition, the availability of effective treatment, and the importance of presymptomatic treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Virginia A Moyer, Kathleen A Kennedy. 2003. Understanding and using diagnostic tests.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-5108(03)00022-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Testing for sexually transmitted diseases in U.S. Public health laboratories in 2004.

OBJECTIVE: Appropriate laboratory testing practices are a critical part of sexually transmitted disease (STD) control. GOAL: The goal of this study was to describe the type and volume of STD tests performed in public health laboratories in the United States in 2004. STUDY DESIGN: A web-based survey was made available to 144 members of the Association of Public Health Laboratories. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen laboratories responded (79%). Overall, 3,553,196 chlamydia tests and 3,461,151 gonorrhea tests were performed; 64.4% of chlamydia tests and 60.8% of gonorrhea tests were nucleic acid amplification tests. Ninety-four percent of laboratories performed syphilis testing. Few laboratories used type-specific tests for herpes simplex virus or used new tests for trichomoniasis, bacterial vaginosis, or human papillomavirus. CONCLUSIONS: This survey collected important data that can be used to monitor trends in STD testing practices in public health laboratories.

Diagnostic Tests, Routine↗

Lab tests online--an untapped resource.

Since its launch in 2001, Lab Tests Online has evolved into the go-to site for consumer information about laboratory testing. In some circles, however, it still remains underutilized as an educational tool for patients. This month, editor-in-chief Anthony S. Kurec reviews the growth of Lab Tests Online and details its ongoing metamorphosis.

Diagnostic Tests, Routine↗