Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 128308

Levodopa.

Abstract

Levodopa administered alone or in combination with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor is at present the best means available for the control of Parkinson symptoms. It has proved particularly effective in Parkinson's disease and postencephalitic parkinsonism. In these disorders its continued administration for periods that now exceed five years has resulted in sustained therapeutic responses and a significant decrease in mortality rate. Levodopa has been shown to be a safe pharmacologic agent even after long-term usage. However, its potential for inducing side effects makes it essential that patients be carefully screened before use and monitored throughout the period of administration. Though not fully established and lacking FDA approval at this time, levodopa appears to be useful in reversing the symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy and as a diagnostic aid in assessing pituitary disorders as well as uncovering presymptomatic Huntington's chorea.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M D Yahr. 1975. Levodopa.. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-83-5-677

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The clinical efficacy of single morning doses of levodopa methyl ester: dispersible Madopar and Sinemet plus in Parkinson disease.

For many patients with Parkinson disease and levodopa-related motor fluctuations, the latency to onset of action of a single dose of a levodopa preparation may be both long and variable. In an effort to find a more rapidly acting and reliable preparation of levodopa, we therefore studied the efficacy of single doses of an oral solution of 250 mg of levodopa methyl ester (ME) with benserazide, 50 mg and of a molar equivalent dose of dispersible Madopar (DM) (50/200) in 13 patients in the fasting state after overnight drug withdrawal. The response of seven of these patients was compared to that after two Sinemet 25/100. The latency to "on" was equally fast with ME and DM, and significantly faster than after standard Sinemet. The duration of "on" was similar with all three. Because of this more rapid relief of "off" periods, both ME and DM offer a potential clinical advantage over standard preparations of levodopa.

Benserazide

Primary combination therapy of early Parkinson's disease. A long-term comparison between the combined regimen bromocriptine/levodopa and levodopa monotherapy--first interim report.

The aim of this multicenter randomized prospective study in patients with early Parkinson's disease is to differentiate over a 4-year period between levodopa/benserazide monotherapy and the corresponding combination with bromocriptine by the assessment of motorial side effects, therapeutical benefit and fine motorial skills. Although there is circumstantial evidence, that partial substitution of levodopa by bromocriptine carries benefit in preventing late levodopa-specific side effects and delaying the declining therapeutical benefit, so far no knowledge has been available how levodopa and the corresponding combination with bromocriptine would compare on a long-term basis. Such study appears all the more important since there are experimental findings consistent with a neurotoxic effect of levodopa on the one hand and some 'protective' impact of bromocriptine on the other. As to the practical procedure of the comparison, all patients were first treated with a levodopa monotherapy for 3 months. This was a platform for the consecutive randomized splitting of the patients into two groups receiving either continuing levodopa therapy or combination therapy, based upon at least 40 +/- 10% substitution of levodopa by bromocriptine. The investigation methods included, besides the usual clinical rating scales (Webster, Zung, Hoehn and Yahr), an apparative test series, the so-called 'MLS', which allowed a sensitive and reliable assessment of fine motorial skills. The results of the first 3 months of treatment with levodopa monotherapy before the consecutive splitting into the two treatment regimens demonstrate that the randomization was successful and that there were no significant differences, that potentially might interfere with the drug-specific evaluation afterwards. The results of the substitution phase show that combined treatment permitted a mean reduction of the levodopa dosage by 40%, without deterioration of therapeutic response. In addition, feasibility of the overall approach based upon a sophisticated interplay between the practising neurologists (101) and the centers (27) was demonstrated.

Benserazide

Evidence of brain dopamine deficiency in schizophrenia.

It is proposed that the increased dopamine function suggested by the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia is a dopaminergic postsynaptic receptor supersensitivity resulting from a dopamine deficiency. In support of this, three double-blind controlled studies conducted on drugs which alter brain dopaminergic activity in a manner different from that of classic neuroleptics are reported. 1) alpha-methyldopa-neuroleptic interaction proved efficacious for schizophrenic positive symptoms but only on a short-term basis. 2) Rubidium improved negative symptoms rapidly, and in contrast has a late onset of action on positive symptoms of schizophrenia. 3) Tryptophan-benserazide was efficacious in controlling both negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia (although less so than chlorpromazine). It is concluded that currently accepted modes of pharmacological therapy (classical neuroleptics) are in the short-term controlling the dopamine supersensitivity secondary to a deficiency, but contributing in the long-term to increase the dopamine deficiency, and so exacerbate the supersensitivity. More effective forms of treatment may involve the use of agents which alter dopamine activity without inducing dopamine supersensitivity.

Benserazide