Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12824354

Tcoffee@igs: A web server for computing, evaluating and combining multiple sequence alignments.

Olivier Poirot·Eamonn O'Toole·Cedric Notredame
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper presents Tcoffee@igs, a new server provided to the community by Hewlet Packard computers and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. This server is a web-based tool dedicated to the computation, the evaluation and the combination of multiple sequence alignments. It uses the latest version of the T-Coffee package. Given a set of unaligned sequences, the server returns an evaluated multiple sequence alignment and the associated phylogenetic tree. This server also makes it possible to evaluate the local reliability of an existing alignment and to combine several alternative multiple alignments into a single new one. Tcoffee@igs can be used for aligning protein, RNA or DNA sequences. Datasets of up to 100 sequences (2000 residues long) can be processed. The server and its documentation are available from: http://igs-server.cnrs-mrs.fr/Tcoffee/.

Explore related subjects

Consensus SequenceInternetPhylogenySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, ProteinSequence Analysis, RNASoftwareJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Olivier Poirot, Eamonn O'Toole, Cedric Notredame. 2003-07-01. Tcoffee@igs: A web server for computing, evaluating and combining multiple sequence alignments.. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar%2Fgkg522

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Signal search analysis server.

Signal search analysis is a general method to discover and characterize sequence motifs that are positionally correlated with a functional site (e.g. a transcription or translation start site). The method has played an instrumental role in the analysis of eukaryotic promoter elements. The signal search analysis server provides access to four different computer programs as well as to a large number of precompiled functional site collections. The programs offered allow: (i) the identification of non-random sequence regions under evolutionary constraint; (ii) the detection of consensus sequence-based motifs that are over- or under-represented at a particular distance from a functional site; (iii) the analysis of the positional distribution of a consensus sequence- or weight matrix-based sequence motif around a functional site; and (iv) the optimization of a weight matrix description of a locally over-represented sequence motif. These programs can be accessed at: http://www.isrec.isb-sib.ch/ssa/.

Consensus Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Performance of two commercially available sequence-based HIV-1 genotyping systems for the detection of drug resistance against HIV type 1 group M subtypes.

The use of genotyping assays for the detection and evaluation of drug resistance mutations within the polymerase gene of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is becoming increasingly relevant in the clinical management of HIV-1 infection. However, genotypic resistance assays available currently have been optimised for genetic subtype B strains of the virus and many clinical centres are presented with strains from subtypes A, C, and D. In the present report, we compare the performance of two sequence-based commercially available kits, the ViroSeq Genotyping System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the TruGene HIV-1 Genotyping Kit (Visible Genetics, Toronto, Ontario) against a panel of 35 virus isolates from HIV-1 Group M (subtypes A-J). Full-length consensus sequences were generated by the ViroSeq genotyping system for 26 of 31 (83.8%) of the isolates tested, in contrast to the TruGene genotyping system, which generated 16 of 30 (53%) usable sequences overall. Overall, subtype B isolates were sequenced with a greater degree of success than non-subtype B isolates. Discrepancies were found between the consensus sequences reported by each system for each sample (mean difference 1.0%; range 0.0-3.2%), but these appeared to be random and did not affect interpretation of the major resistance codons. In addition, both systems were able to amplify template RNA from low copy viral load plasma samples (10(2)-10(3) RNA copies/ml) taken from a random selection of patient samples encompassing subtypes A-C. While the availability of these genotyping systems should facilitate studies of HIV-1 drug resistance in countries in which these subtypes are prevalent, the performance against subtypes other than B needs to be improved.

Consensus Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Detection and typing of HPV genotypes in various cervical lesions by HPV oligonucleotide microarray.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate a clinical efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV) oligonucleotide microarray (Biomedlab Co., Seoul, South Korea) for the detection of HPVs in various cervical lesions. RESULTS: HPV DNAs from 234 patients were analysed by two methods. Among those, 212 patients were classified into 5 groups according to the histologic diagnosis: chronic cervicitis, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I, CIN II, CIN III, and invasive cervical carcinoma. PCR-RFLP could detect 7 types of high-risk HPVs (HPV 16/18/31/33/35/52/58) and HPV microarray could detect 15 types of high-risk HPVs (HPV 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68/69) and 7 types of low-risk HPVs (HPV 6/11/34/40/42/43/44).HPV genotyping by HPV oligonucleotide microarray revealed that HPV16 was the most frequent type (30.2%) in all specimens tested and was significantly more frequent in CIN III and invasive carcinomas than other lesions. METHODS: HPV DNAs were detected in 158 and 174 of the 234 cervical samples by PCR-RFLP and HPV microarray, respectively. The correlation between the two methods was good in detecting HPVs in general (kappa index = 0.69) and HPVs 31 and 52 (kappa index = 0.70 and 0.70, respectively) and excellent in detecting HPVs 16, 18, 33, 35, and 58 (kappa index = 0.90, 0.88, 0.92, 0.77, and 0.84, respectively). Double HPV infection was detected in 10 cases and one triple infection was detected. By combining cytology and HPV testing, the sensitivity was improved to 87.5, 95.5, 96.1, and 97.2% in CIN I, CIN II, CIN III, and carcinoma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This results suggest that HPV oligonucleotide microarray is a highly comparable method to the previously used PCR-RFLP method for the detection of HPVs in cervical specimens. Genetic informations for HPV infection in cervical specimens may offer new strategies in manipulating the patients harboring cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma.

Consensus Sequence↗