Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12814403

Obstructed defecation.

A D'Hoore·F Penninckx
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the last decade our understanding of pelvic floor function and dysfunction has improved significantly. A more rational diagnostic and therapeutic approach is now possible for the group of patients with constipation due to obstructed defecation (OD). METHODS: The review is based on a literature search using the PubMed database focusing mainly on recent literature addressing the subject. RESULTS: Obstructed defecation occurs in about 7% of the adult population. Different pathophysiological mechanisms, either functional or anatomical, eventually lead to OD. Different tests (defecography, balloon evacuation test, manometry, electromyography, colonic transit time measurementmanometry) play an important role to quantify the problem. These tests are not without problems as abnormal results are also found in asymptomatic controls. Also, there is poor agreement between different tests and a poor correlation with symptomatology. Thus, for most syndromes conservative treatment including biofeedback is appropriate. Surgery can yield excellent results in selected cases. CONCLUSION: Validation of scoring systems and quantitative tests is still needed. More uniform and strict criteria for anismus should be applied to make therapeutic approaches comparable. Appropriate selection of patients for surgery is the key to success.

Explore related subjects

Biofeedback, PsychologyConstipationDefecographyHumansManometryJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A D'Hoore, F Penninckx. 2003. Obstructed defecation.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00497.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Electroencephalographic(EEG)-based communication: EEG control versus system performance in humans.

People can learn to control electroencephalographic (EEG) sensorimotor rhythm amplitude so as to move a cursor to select among choices on a computer screen. We explored the dependence of system performance on EEG control. Users moved the cursor to reach a target at one of four possible locations. EEG control was measured as the correlation (r(2)) between rhythm amplitude and target location. Performance was measured as accuracy (% of targets hit) and as information transfer rate (bits/trial). The relationship between EEG control and accuracy can be approximated by a linear function that is constant for all users. The results facilitate offline predictions of the effects on performance of using different EEG features or combinations of features to control cursor movement.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗
PubMed2003

Biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for the rehabilitation of urinary stress incontinence.

We investigated the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercises or biofeedback for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence (USI). Fifty patients with USI were included in this randomized, controlled, prospective study. Twenty patients were taught PFM exercises via digital palpation and instructed to perform regularly as home program. The second group of 20 patients had PFM exercises via biofeedback three times a week for 2 months. The third group of 10 patients did not have any exercises. The patients were evaluated via pad test, perineometry, digital palpation based PFM strength, incontinence frequency, and visual analog scale based social activity index prior to and 8 weeks after the treatment. The first two groups had significant improvement in USI with respect to the control group (p < 0.001). The rise in PFM strength with perineometry of the biofeedback group was higher than in the digital palpation group after treatment (p < 0.001). PFM exercises are effective for the treatment of USI; the biofeedback method revealed better PFM strength results with respect to digital palpation.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗
PubMed2003

Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry.

Our ability to recognize and manipulate objects relies on our haptic sense of the objects' geometry. But little is known about the acuity of haptic perception compared to other senses like sight and hearing. Here, we determined how accurately humans could sense various geometric features of objects across the workspace. Subjects gripped the handle of a robot arm which was programmed to keep the hand inside a planar region with straight or curved boundaries. With eyes closed, subjects moved the manipulandum along this virtual wall and judged its curvature or direction. We mapped their sensitivity in different parts of the workspace. We also tested subjects' ability to discriminate between boundaries with different degrees of curvature, to sense the rate of change of curvature, and to detect the elongation or flattening of ellipses. We found that subjects' estimates of the curvature of their hand path were close to veridical, and did not change across the workspace though they did vary somewhat with hand path direction. Subjects were less accurate at judging the direction of the hand path in an egocentric frame of reference, and were slightly poorer at discriminating between arcs of different curvature than at detecting absolute curvature. They also consistently mistook flattened ellipses and paths of decreasing curvature (inward spirals) for circles-and mistook arcs of true circles for arcs of tall ellipses or outward spirals. Nevertheless, the sensitivity of haptic perception compared well with that of spatial vision in other studies. Furthermore, subjects detected curvature and directional deviations much smaller than those that actually arise for most reaching movements. These findings suggest that our haptic sense is acute enough to guide and train motor systems and to form accurate representations of shapes.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗