Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12813724

Linkage analysis with sequential imputation.

Abstract

Multilocus calculations, using all available information on all pedigree members, are important for linkage analysis. Exact calculation methods in linkage analysis are limited in either the number of loci or the number of pedigree members they can handle. In this article, we propose a Monte Carlo method for linkage analysis based on sequential imputation. Unlike exact methods, sequential imputation can handle large pedigrees with a moderate number of loci in its current implementation. This Monte Carlo method is an application of importance sampling, in which we sequentially impute ordered genotypes locus by locus, and then impute inheritance vectors conditioned on these genotypes. The resulting inheritance vectors, together with the importance sampling weights, are used to derive a consistent estimator of any linkage statistic of interest. The linkage statistic can be parametric or nonparametric; we focus on nonparametric linkage statistics. We demonstrate that accurate estimates can be achieved within a reasonable computing time. A simulation study illustrates the potential gain in power using our method for multilocus linkage analysis with large pedigrees. We simulated data at six markers under three models. We analyzed them using both sequential imputation and GENEHUNTER. GENEHUNTER had to drop between 38-54% of pedigree members, whereas our method was able to use all pedigree members. The power gains of using all pedigree members were substantial under 2 of the 3 models. We implemented sequential imputation for multilocus linkage analysis in a user-friendly software package called SIMPLE.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zachary Skrivanek, Shili Lin, Mark Irwin. 2003. Linkage analysis with sequential imputation.. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.10249

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Statistical test to compare the linkage model and the admixture model based on central limit results.

In the Admixture Model, the probability that an individual carries a certain allele at a specific marker depends on the allele frequencies in K ancestral populations and the proportion of the individual's genome originating from these populations. The markers are assumed to be independent. The Linkage Model is a Hidden Markov Model that extends the Admixture Model by incorporating linkage between neighboring loci. We prove consistency and asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators for the ancestry of individuals in the Linkage Model, complementing earlier results by (Pfaff et al., 2004; Pfaffelhuber and Rohde, 2022; Heinzel, 2025) for the Admixture Model. These results are used to prove that a statistical test that allows for model selection between the Admixture Model and the Linkage Model is an asymptotic level-α-test. Finally, we demonstrate the practical relevance of our results by applying the test to real-world data from The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2015).

Genetic Linkage↗

Haplotype thinking in lung disease.

To identify the genetic etiology of a disease of interest, disease-related characteristics (phenotypes) are often tested for association with genetic variants (genotypes). Although genetic association studies of single genetic variants have been widely performed, there has been increasing interest in studies of multiple adjacent genetic variants on one chromosome, known as a haplotype. In this review, we will provide background about the origin of haplotypes and why they can be useful in genetic studies; we will discuss approaches to determining haplotypes and performing haplotype-based genetic association studies; and we will compare single variant and haplotype-based approaches.

Genetic Linkage↗

Associations between DNA markers and resistance to diseases in sugarcane and effects of population substructure.

Association between markers and sugarcane diseases were investigated in a collection of 154 sugarcane clones, consisting of important ancestors or parents, and cultivars. 1,068 polymorphic AFLP and 141 SRR markers were scored across all clones. Data on the four most important diseases in the Australian sugarcane industry were obtained; these diseases being pachymetra root rot (Pachymetra chaunorhiza B.J. Croft & M.W. Dick), leaf scald (Xanthomonas albilineans Dowson), Fiji leaf gall (Fiji disease virus), and smut (Ustilago scitaminea H. & P. Sydow). By a simple regression analysis, association between markers and diseases could be readily detected. However, many of these associations were due to the effects of embedded population structure and random effects. After taking population structure into account, we found that 59% of the phenotypic variation in smut resistance ratings could be accounted for by 11 markers, 32% of variation for leaf scald and pachymetra root rot rating by 4 markers, and 26% of Fiji leaf gall by 5 markers. The results suggest that marker-trait associations can be readily detected in populations generated from modern sugarcane breeding programs. This may be due to special features of past sugarcane breeding programs leading to persistent linkage disequilibrium in modern parental populations.

Genetic Linkage↗