Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12762449

Penalized estimating equations.

Abstract

Penalty models--such as the ridge estimator, the Stein estimator, the bridge estimator, and the Lasso-have been proposed to deal with collinearity in regressions. The Lasso, for instance, has been applied to linear models, logistic regressions, Cox proportional hazard models, and neural networks. This article considers the bridge penalty model with penalty sigma(j)/beta(j)/gamma for estimating equations in general and applies this penalty model to the generalized estimating equations (GEE) in longitudinal studies. The lack of joint likelihood in the GEE is overcome by the penalized estimating equations, in which no joint likelihood is required. The asymptotic results for the penalty estimator are provided. It is demonstrated, with a simulation and an application, that the penalized GEE potentially improves the performance of the GEE estimator, and enjoys the same properties as linear penalty models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wenjiang J Fu. 2003. Penalized estimating equations.. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0420.00015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An integrated multiscale air quality modelling framework for industrial park pollution: Linking local emissions to regional transport.

Capturing the spatiotemporal distribution of pollutants in industrial parks remains challenging for regional air quality models because of their coarse resolution (3 km), resulting in uncertainties in local emission quantification. To address this, we developed the Integrated Multiscale Air Quality Modelling System for Industry (IAQMS-Industry), coupling the regional Nested Air Quality Prediction Modelling System (NAQPMS) with a city-scale chemical transport model. This framework integrates point-source locations and Gaussian plume dispersion to simulate particulate matter with a diameter smaller than 2.5 micrometres (PM2.5) at 100 m resolution. Applied to the Beijing Yi Zhuang and Tangshan industrial parks and evaluated against observations. The coupled model achieved a normalized mean bias (NMB) ranging from 3.1 % to 6.2 %, improving upon NAQPMS (-16.9 % to -7.7 %). Spatial analysis revealed that coarse regional grids underestimated the PM2.5​ concentrations at industrial sites by smoothing gradients, whereas IAQMS-Industry successfully resolved spatial patterns. Industrial point emissions accounted for 22.9 %-26.4 % of PM2.5 in the coupled model, which was significantly greater than the regional model estimates of 1.6 %-13.7 %. These findings indicate that regional models overestimate pollutant dispersion processes in industrial parks while underestimating local industrial impacts. By explicitly resolving point-source dynamics and linking them to regional transport, IAQMS-Industry provides a robust tool for designing targeted emission controls in industrial cities and balancing local air quality improvements with minimized regional pollution outflow. This study underscores the necessity of multiscale modelling for accurate source apportionment and informed environmental governance in industrial zones.

Air Pollution↗