Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12739846

Future AAC technology needs: consumer perspectives.

Abstract

This article suggests the need for rethinking the role that consumer perspectives will play (and ought to play) in the design and development of future augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) technologies. After carefully defining what they mean by "AAC consumers," "consumer perspectives," and "AAC technologies," the authors consider the extent to which current research has illuminated our understanding of (1) how consumers view AAC technologies and (2) how consumers themselves would define future technology needs. It's not a pretty picture. While it is clear that there already exist specific constructs and methods that could enable researchers and developers to learn more about consumer perspectives, it is equally clear that few, if any, researchers make much use of these constructs and methods. The authors focus specifically on ways that consumer perspective can helpfully infuse participatory action research, technology transfer processes, and ergonomics. In addition, the authors consider how research that investigates the ways in which assistive technologies impact the daily lives of individuals with severe communication impairment also influences public policy issues, which can in turn affect future definitions of AAC technology needs. Throughout the article, the authors advocate for a paradigm shift in the quantity and quality of the collaborations that occur between AAC consumers and AAC researchers, manufacturers, and developers. Augmented communicators and their families have a major stake in all types of research that can affect the design and development of AAC devices and accessories, and the results of this research, in turn, can affect public policy decisions about AAC technologies. This makes it all the more important that AAC consumers be involved at each step of the research and development process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sarah W Blackstone, Michael B Williams, Mick Joyce. 2002. Future AAC technology needs: consumer perspectives.. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2002.10132051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A head movement image (HMI)-controlled computer mouse for people with disabilities.

PURPOSE: This study proposes image processing and microprocessor technology for use in developing a head movement image (HMI)-controlled computer mouse system for the spinal cord injured (SCI). METHOD: The system controls the movement and direction of the mouse cursor by capturing head movement images using a marker installed on the user's headset. In the clinical trial, this new mouse system was compared with an infrared-controlled mouse system on various tasks with nine subjects with SCI. RESULTS: The results were favourable to the new mouse system. The differences between the new mouse system and the infrared-controlled mouse were reaching statistical significance in each of the test situations (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The HMI-controlled computer mouse improves the input speed. People with disabilities need only wear the headset and move their heads to freely control the movement of the mouse cursor.

Communication Devices for People with Disabilities↗

A brain-computer interface (BCI) for the locked-in: comparison of different EEG classifications for the thought translation device.

OBJECTIVE: The Thought Translation Device (TTD) for brain-computer interaction was developed to enable totally paralyzed patients to communicate. Patients learn to regulate slow cortical potentials (SCPs) voluntarily with feedback training to select letters. This study reports the comparison of different methods of electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis to improve spelling accuracy with the TTD on a data set of 6,650 trials of a severely paralyzed patient. METHODS: Selections of letters occurred by exceeding a certain SCP amplitude threshold. To enhance the patient's control of an additional event-related cortical potential, a filter with two filter characteristics ('mixed filter') was developed and applied on-line. To improve performance off-line the criterion for threshold-related decisions was varied. Different types of discriminant analysis were applied to the EEG data set as well as on wavelet transformed EEG data. RESULTS: The mixed filter condition increased the patients' performance on-line compared to the SCP filter alone. A threshold, based on the ratio between required selections and rejections, resulted in a further improvement off-line. Discriminant analysis of both time-series SCP data and wavelet transformed data increased the patient's correct response rate off-line. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to communicate with event-related potentials using the mixed filter feedback method. As wavelet transformed data cannot be fed back on-line before the end of a trial, they are applicable only if immediate feedback is not necessary for a brain-computer interface (BCI). For future BCIs, wavelet transformed data should serve for BCIs without immediate feedback. A stepwise wavelet transformation would even allow immediate feedback.

Communication Devices for People with Disabilities↗

Was blind but now I see.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Communication Devices for People with Disabilities↗