Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12731438

[Quality control plan for a primary bladder neoplastic process].

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer may change survival rates (6). We present the application of a plan for quality control in the management of primary bladder cancer, studying delays globally, and for individual indicators, as well as the impact of implemented improvement measures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review to detect problems appeared through the whole clinical management process in a population of patients undergoing surgery for primary bladder cancer in the Hospital Costa del Sol during 2001. Causes were studied and corrective measures established, application of which has been evaluated during the first semester of 2002. Study indicators encompass from delay time for first visit to delay time for radical surgical treatment. RESULTS: Excessive average global delays for radical treatment of bladder tumor (208.3 days), and variability in the time to transurethral resection (one to 73.42 days) and to postoperative revision (54.4 days), were the most significant results. Evaluation of implemented measures shows a descent in global delays (134.2 days) and time to postoperative revision variability (32.4 days). CONCLUSIONS: Application of quality control procedures for clinical management is essential in daily clinical practice, for systematic, continuous, and rigorous evaluation will allow us to offer patients a product that satisfies their personal and social expectations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cristóbal Marchal Escalona, Miguel Padilla León, Javier García Penit, Jesús Caballero Alcántara. 2003. [Quality control plan for a primary bladder neoplastic process].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12731438/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison of assertive community treatment and intensive case management for patients in rural areas.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the evidence for the effectiveness of community-based services for rural areas, specifically assertive community treatment and intensive case management. Service delivery to persons with severe mental illness in rural areas is challenged by low population densities, limited services, and shortages of professionals. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search identified six studies of rural assertive community treatment, only two of which were controlled studies, and four rural intensive case management studies, only one of which was a controlled study. Assertive community treatment would seem ideally suited to areas lacking services because of its self-contained multidisciplinary treatment team approach. However, rural programs have been forced to make several adaptations to the assertive community treatment model, including smaller teams, less comprehensive staff, and less intensive services. There is no published evidence that these adaptations are able to produce the same results as full-fidelity teams. Some believe that intensive case management may be an alternative to assertive community treatment in rural settings because intensive case management emphasizes individual caseloads, fewer staff, less intensive contacts, and brokered services. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that intensive case management programs are effective only in community settings where there is an ample supply of treatment and support services. To build the evidence base for the effectiveness of these models, much more attention needs to be focused on evaluating the current wave of assertive community treatment and intensive case management dissemination in rural areas.

Case Management↗

Factors associated with specific language impairment and later language development during early life: a literature review.

It has been reported that 50% of children with specific language impairment (SLI) have persistent SLI, which has been associated with various risk factors. To date, however, there has not been a comprehensive review of studies into different risk factors that could be used by clinicians to facilitate parental counseling and individual case-management. Several studies about the factors associated with SLI were reviewed based on study design. This article presents a review of factors associated with later language development and SLI, and reviews the risk for children who have SLI during early life. The summary provides data including specific biologic and environmental factors that are significantly associated with SLI, to ensure early intervention for children with SLI in the presence of identified risk factors.

Case Management↗