Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12723051

Membrane current from transmembrane potentials in complex core-conductor models.

Abstract

Core-conductor models, used to integrate the behavior of the longitudinal currents with the distributed voltages of electrically active tissue, have evolved for over a century. A critical step in the use of such models is the computation of membrane current from the set of distributed transmembrane potential values that exist at a given moment, where the potentials are obtained either experimentally or computationally. Over time, interest has developed in a number of substantial extensions of the original model to include such features as nonuniform spatial resistances, loop instead of linear structure, and multiple sites of extracellular stimulation. This paper concisely restates and extends the equations for calculation of transmembrane currents with the systematic inclusion of alternative cases, noting how they reduce to the standard forms. An important issue is how complex the calculation of membrane current has to be. Thus, the paper goes on to show criteria (based on the uniformity of resistance and the presence of stimulation) for deciding when membrane currents can be obtained with a relatively simple calculation with a single equation involving local variables versus with a more complex calculation involving the simultaneous solution of a (possibly large) set of equations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Roger C Barr, Robert Plonsey, Chad R Johnson. 2003. Membrane current from transmembrane potentials in complex core-conductor models.. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2003.809508

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Geophysical imaging of root-zone, trunk, and moisture heterogeneity.

The most significant biotic and abiotic stress agents of water extremity, salinity, and infection lead to wood decay and modifications of moisture and ion content, and density. This strongly influences the (di-)electrical and mechanical properties and justifies the application of geophysical imaging techniques. These are less invasive and have high resolution in contrast to classical methods of destructive, single-point measurements for inspecting stresses in trees and soils. This review presents some in situ and in vivo applications of electric, radar, and seismic methods for studying water status and movement in soils, roots, and tree trunks. The electrical properties of a root-zone are a consequence of their moisture content. Electrical imaging discriminates resistive, woody roots from conductive, soft roots. Both types are recognized by low radar velocities and high attenuation. Single roots can generate diffraction hyperbolas in radargrams. Pedophysical relationships of water content to electrical resistivity and radar velocity are established by diverse infiltration experiments in the field, laboratory, and in the full-scale 'GeoModel' at Kiel University. Subsurface moisture distributions are derived from geophysical attribute models. The ring electrode technique around trunks images the growth ring structure of concentric resistivity, which is inversely proportional to the fluid content. Healthy trees show a central high resistivity within the dry heartwood that strongly decreases towards the peripheral wet sapwood. Observed structural deviations are caused by infection, decay, shooting, or predominant light and/or wind directions. Seismic trunk tomography also differentiates between decayed and healthy woods.

Electric Impedance↗

Technology review: Esophageal impedance monitoring.

Intraluminal impedance monitoring is a new technique that can be used to detect the flow of liquids and gas through hollow viscera. In combination with manometry, it is used for esophageal function testing and while manometry provides information on contractile activity, impedance provides information on esophageal bolus transit. This is especially useful in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia. However, impedance monitoring appears to be less suitable for the evaluation of patients with achalasia. When used in combination with esophageal pH monitoring, impedance monitoring makes gastroesophageal reflux monitoring more complete because it allows recognition of both acidic and weakly acidic reflux episodes. The results of several studies suggest that impedance-pH monitoring is useful in the evaluation of patients with PPI-resistant typical reflux symptoms, chronic unexplained cough, excessive belching, and rumination.

Electric Impedance↗