Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12694608

Archaea: an archetype for replication initiation studies?

Lori M Kelman·Zvi Kelman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Whereas the process of DNA replication is fundamentally conserved in the three domains of life, the archaeal system is closer to that of eukarya than bacteria. In the time since the complete genome sequences of several members of the archaeal domain became available, there has been a burst of research on archaeal DNA replication. These studies have led to both expected and surprising findings. This review summarizes the search for origins of replication in archaea, and our current knowledge of initiation, the process by which replication origins are recognized, the DNA molecule is unwound and the replicative helicase is loaded onto the DNA in preparation for DNA synthesis. The similarities and differences of the initiation process in archea, bacteria and eukarya are also summarized.

Explore related subjects

ArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsDNA HelicasesDNA ReplicationDNA, ArchaealDNA-Binding ProteinsModels, GeneticModels, MolecularProtein Structure, TertiaryReplication OriginJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lori M Kelman, Zvi Kelman. 2003. Archaea: an archetype for replication initiation studies?. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03369.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Ori-Finder-Arch: An Updated Web Server for the Annotation and Visualization of Archaeal Replication Origins.

Archaea are promising chassis organisms in biotechnology, and the accurate annotation of their chromosomal replication origins (oriCs) is the key to unlocking their full potential. However, the existing Ori-Finder 2 web server suffers from low accuracy, slow speed, and limited scalability. In this study, we present Ori-Finder-Arch, an updated web server for high-performance oriC prediction in archaea. This pipeline integrates HMMER-based replication initiation protein (RIP) annotation, refined consensus motif recognition, and GC profile-based DNA unwinding element (DUE) detection. On a benchmark set of experimentally validated oriCs, Ori-Finder-Arch achieved a recall of 95.6% and a precision of 86.0%, substantially outperforming Ori-Finder 2 (62.2% and 63.6%, respectively), while running 4.75 times faster and supporting diverse assembly levels. When applied to the available archaeal assemblies, it successfully annotated 17,472 oriCs. Meanwhile, the web server provides interactive visualizations at different levels. In conclusion, Ori-Finder-Arch offers an efficient, accurate, and user-friendly platform for advanced studies of archaeal DNA replication initiation and synthetic biology applications, and is freely available at https://tubic.org/Ori-Finder-Arch/ and https://tubic.tju.edu.cn/Ori-Finder-Arch/.

Archaea↗
PubMed2026

Genome-resolved assessment of archaeal diversity in full-scale anaerobic digesters reveals variability in mcrA primer coverage.

AIMS: Methanogenic archaea are key players in anaerobic digestion, driving methane production in biogas reactors. This study aimed to assess the diversity of methanogenic archaea in full-scale anaerobic digesters using genome-resolved metagenomics and to systematically evaluate the taxonomic coverage of commonly used mcrA-targeted qPCR primer sets against this genomic framework. METHODS AND RESULTS: Methanogenic diversity was assessed using 113 dereplicated archaeal metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) recovered from 109 full-scale anaerobic digesters treating diverse substrates. Genome-resolved analyses revealed a diverse archaeal community spanning multiple phyla, dominated by Halobacteriota and Methanobacteriota, with additional representatives from Methanobacteriota_B, Thermoplasmatota, and Thermoproteota. The presence of the mcrA gene was identified in a subset 55 MAGs, which were subsequently used as the genomic framework to evaluate six commonly used mcrA qPCR primer sets in silico. This subset clustered into nine phylogenetic groups and formed the basis for the primer coverage analysis. The evaluation revealed marked differences in taxonomic coverage among primer sets. Most primers preferentially detected Methanobacteriales and Methanosarcinales, while underrepresenting or excluding other methanogenic lineages, including H₂-dependent methylotrophic Methanomassiliicoccaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Commonly used mcrA primer sets differ substantially in their ability to capture methanogenic diversity, with some showing broad representation of reactor-associated methanogens and others exhibiting strong lineage-specific biases. Genome-resolved metagenomics provides an effective framework for benchmarking primer performance and supports the selection and improvement of molecular tools for more accurate monitoring of anaerobic digestion systems.

Archaea↗
PubMed2026

Unraveling the coastal marine plastisphere archaeome.

Plastic pollution has created an expanding anthropogenic microbial niche, the plastisphere, raising questions about microbial ecology and associated impacts. Archaea, the third domain of life with fundamental ecological and evolutionary significance, remain poorly understood in this habitat. Here, using paired plastic debris and bulk-water samples from coastal marine ecosystems, key archaeal habitats increasingly threatened by plastic pollution, we characterize the plastisphere archaeome through archaeal amplicon sequencing and metagenomics. We show that the archaeome is significantly reshaped in the plastisphere, exhibiting higher taxonomic diversity, greater community heterogeneity, and selective enrichment of Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota. Archaeal genes involved in methane, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling are enriched in the plastisphere. Taxonomic and functional divergence between the plastisphere and bulk water increases with anthropogenic chemical stress. These findings suggest that plastic pollution could alter marine archaeal diversity, biogeography, and biogeochemical potential, extending understanding of plastisphere impacts to the archaeal domain.

Archaea↗