Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12637042

Visual dysfunction in artists.

Noel G Dan
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The representation of the world provided by an artist is often modified by abnormalities in the visual pathways. Some artists have used these distortions to create a particular style. Controversy surrounds earlier artists whose visual function was not well documented historically. Drugs and psychiatric disease may also modify the artist's imagery.

Explore related subjects

AstigmatismCataractFamous PersonsHallucinogensHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMaleMental DisordersPaintingsVisual PerceptionHistorical ArticleJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Noel G Dan. 2003. Visual dysfunction in artists.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-5868(02)00334-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Mathematical model of corneal surface smoothing after laser refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To construct a quantitative model of corneal surface smoothing after laser ablation for refractive correction. DESIGN: Experimental study, interventional case series, and meta-analysis of literature. METHODS: A theory of epithelial smoothing in response to corneal contour change is derived from differential equations that describe epithelial migration, growth, and loss. Computer simulations calculate the effects on postoperative epithelial thickness, topography, refraction, and spherical aberration. Model parameter is matched with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcome in literature and in a retrospective study of primary spherical myopic (77 eyes) and hyperopic (19 eyes) corrections. Surgically induced refractive change was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Simulated epithelial remodeling after myopic ablation produces central epithelial thickening, reduction in achieved correction, and induction of oblate spherical aberration. Simulation of hyperopic ablation shows peripheral epithelial thickening, a larger reduction in correction, and induction of prolate spherical aberration. Simulation using a minus cylinder laser ablation pattern shows decreased astigmatism correction and increased hyperopic shift. In the LASIK series, linear regression of achieved correction vs ablation setting in hyperopic and minus cylinder corrections shows slopes of 0.97, 0.71, and 0.74, respectively. These clinical results match model predictions when the smoothing constant is set at 0.32, 0.63, and 0.55 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial thickness modulations after ablation can be modeled mathematically to explain clinically observed regression and induction of aberration. The cornea appears to smooth over ablated features smaller than approximately 0.5 mm. The model provides an approach for designing ablation patterns that precompensate for the smoothing to improve final outcome.

Astigmatism↗
PubMed2003

Corneal ectasia detected 32 months after LASIK for correction of myopia and asymmetric astigmatism.

We report a case of corneal ectasia detected 32 months after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of -4.25 diopters (D) of myopia associated with -2.00 D of regular but slight asymmetric astigmatism. The patient retained stable visual acuity for 15 months postoperatively. The preoperative corneal thickness was 540 microm, and the postablation untouched stroma was assumed to be 290 microm. Although a rare complication of LASIK, corneal ectasia can occur, and there is no consensus regarding how much stroma should be left intact to avoid it. Until we have a better understanding of corneal strength, we think surface photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy ablations should be considered instead of LASIK in borderline cases.

Astigmatism↗
PubMed2003

Image size magnification and power and dilation factors for optical instruments in general.

Traditional treatments of spectacle magnification for distant objects consider only stigmatic spectacle lenses and they compare the retinal image size in a refractively fully compensated eye with the image size in the uncompensated eye. Spectacle magnification is expressed as a product of two factors, the power and shape factors of the lens. The power factor depends on the position of the entrance pupil of the eye. For an eye with an astigmatic cornea, however, the position of the entrance pupil is not well defined. Thus, the traditional approach to spectacle magnification does not generalize properly to allow for astigmatism. Within the constraints of linear optics and subject to the restriction that the eye's iris remains the aperture stop, this paper provides a complete, unified and exact treatment for optical instruments in general. It compares retinal image size in a generalized sense (including image shape and orientation) for any instrument in front of an eye with that of the eye alone irrespective of whether the instrument compensates or not. The approach does not make use of the concept of the entrance pupil at all and it allows for astigmatism and for non-alignment of refracting elements in the instrument and in the eye. The concept of spectacle magnification generalizes to the concept of instrument size magnification. Instrument size magnification can be expressed as the product of two matrix factors one of which can be interpreted as a power factor (as back-vertex power) and the other factor for which the name dilation factor is more appropriate in general. The general treatment is then applied to a number of special cases including afocal instruments, spectacle lenses (including obliquely crossing thick bitoric lenses), contact lenses, stigmatic systems and stigmatic eyes. In the case of spectacle lenses, the dilation factor reduces to the usual shape factor.

Astigmatism↗