Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 126014

Echocardiography.

Abstract

We have discussed the evolution of selected areas of echocardiography in an attempt to illustrate the capabilities and limitations of this method of study. As information has accumulated, some concepts of the specificity of certain echocardiographic patterns have had to be revised. Awareness of the potential for false positive and false negative results has increased rather than decreased the usefulness of the echo method. Equipment deficiencies which existed in past years have largely been corrected, thereby reducing the likelihood of repeating some of the earlier mistakes. Two years ago, we suggested that more patients with left ventricular disease should be studied, the results from different laboratories should be compared, a large number of patients with congenital disease should be evaluated, and the limitations of the technic be more precisely defined. Obviously much has been accomplished in all of these areas. Much more can be done. There is every reason to believe that the next few years will bring many new and important developments in diagnostic echocardiography.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C R Joyner. 1975. Echocardiography.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(75)90419-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Matching total body oxygen consumption and delivery: a crucial objective?

The strength of the rationale for incorporating total body oxygen consumption (VO(2)) and delivery (DO(2)) into our decision making strategies contrasts with the absence of demonstrated benefits of bedside calculations in clinical practice. This situation mandates a careful reappraisal of the theoretical limitations of bedside calculations of DO(2) and VO(2), including a re-evaluation of the clinical situations in which these calculations are valid. Three levels of complexity can be distinguished when analysing a patient's hemodynamic status: 1) simple cases where investigations can be limited to clinical monitoring, including lactate changes over time; 2) intermediate situations requiring invasive investigations in which continuous monitoring of VO(2)-related variables such as cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation often provide enough information to guide clinical decision; and 3) complex situations where assessment of VO(2) and VO(2)/DO(2) analysis might be recommended. Although studies that support such recommendations are limited they are based on a widely accepted physiological model. VO(2) and DO(2) analysis is also limited by theoretical and technical difficulties. In this article, we discuss the validity of these limitations in the bedside assessment of VO(2) and DO(2), and review data supporting the use of VO(2)/DO(2) analysis in the clinical evaluation of complex cases.

Cardiac Output↗

Positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome - an old yet mysterious tool.

A recent study by Bruhn and colleagues, discussed here, confirms that even high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) - up to 20 cmH2O - may be applied in conditions of moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome. Such levels of PEEP were found to be safe in terms of their impact on cardiac output and adequacy of gastric mucosal perfusion once systemic haemodynamics were stabilized by adequate fluid replacement and catecholamine therapy. However, we strongly recommend that the reader does not oversimplify the conclusions of that study. PEEP therapy is not inherently safe with respect to haemodynamics and regional organ perfusion, but it may be used safely, even at high levels of up to 20 cmH2O, if haemodynamic therapy is appropriate.

Cardiac Output↗