Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12546262

Learning about new anesthetics using a model driven, full human simulator.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: New pharmacological agents are introduced into medical practice at an ever-increasing pace. Teaching how to use new medications in the clinical setting presents educational challenges and puts patients at risk. METHODS: Patients and clinical settings in which remifentanil might provide clinical advantages over existing anesthetics were identified. A simulator curriculum was developed to demonstrate the use of remifentanil in the sample cases. The simulation was designed to highlight the clinical advantages and potential side effects of remifentanil. A screen displaying the concentrations of remifentanil in plasma and in the hypothetical effector site was developed. A simulator was modified (addition of an infusion pump and a pharmacokinetic screen display) and transported to several cities in the U.S.A. An instructor guided small groups of anesthesiologists and anesthetists through a structured program that enabled participants to observe drug effects in simulated patients. RESULTS: There were 836 participants in the remifentanil program, which was offered in 58 cities in the U.S.A. Surveys were completed by 574 anesthesiologists. There was a significant difference in comfort level for using remifentanil after the session compared to before (Chi-square, p < 0.001.) The statement: "Clinical simulation experience is a means to learn about new agents like remifentanil" was rated as "excellent" by 81% and as "good" by 19% of participants. No participant found the experience to be "not useful." CONCLUSIONS: Patient simulation is a novel method of introducing new drugs to the medical community and is perceived by anesthesia providers as a valuable addition to available teaching methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Bosseau Murray, Michael L Good, Joachim S Gravenstein, Johannes H van Oostrom, W Glover Brasfield. 2002. Learning about new anesthetics using a model driven, full human simulator.. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1021294002356

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗