Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1247432

Occupational differences between conventional and saturation divers.

Abstract

Diving experiences of 53 Divers First Class attending the U.S. Navy Saturation Diver Training Program were compared to 155 Divers First Class performing routine operational dives. The two groups were matched for years of diving experience, total number of dives, and total number of SCUBA dives. The Diving Experience Questionnaire (DEQ), which consisted of 43 items dealing with specific diving conditions and activites, was used to document the diving backgrounds of the two groups. Five of the 43 items were found to significantly and uniquely differentiate between the two groups. Those attending the Saturation Diving Program a) made more dives between 46-61 m (151-200 ft), b) had more experience with semiclosed-circuit SCUBA, c) attended more deep-diving training courses, d) made fewer dives in water warmer than 70 degrees F, and e) had fewer specialized qualifications outside deep diving. The multiple regression analysis which differentiated between the two groups resulted in an R of 0.48. These five items indicate that volunteering for saturation diving is consistent or congruent with past deep-diving experience, while remaining in conventional diving is congruent with previous shallow-water experience. These results indicate that the DEQ may be a highly useful method of differentiating between experienced divers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R J Biersner, D A Hall, P G Linaweaver. 1976. Occupational differences between conventional and saturation divers.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1247432/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Activity-based rate-adaptive pacemakers under hyperbaric conditions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test a variety of currently available activity-based rate-adaptive pacemakers under hyperbaric conditions. BACKGROUND: Sports divers with pacemakers can dive under certain circumstances. The rate response of activity-sensing pacing under hyperbaric conditions has rarely been evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We manufactured a miniaturized hyperbaric chamber. A pacemaker inside was kept close to the corresponding telemetry wand placed on top of the chamber. An inflation device for coronary balloon angioplasty was used to create hydraulic pressure. Group I pacemakers were exposed to a 30 msw/98 fsw/4 ATA and after a 1-month waiting period to 60 msw/197 fsw-depth/7 ATA. Group II was exposed to only one dive to 60 msw. The electrogram and event marker telemetry were used to monitor the pacing stimuli and measurements were made for case distortion. RESULTS: The baseline pacing rate did not change in 27 tests. Return to baseline was shown during 18 tests after transient sensor-driven rate. There was a sensor rate response to manual brief shaking during and following testing. A case distortion was shown in 15 of 29 tests at 60 m. CONCLUSIONS: Modern accelerometers showed no sensitivity to pressure on the pacemaker can at 30 msw/98 fsw and 60 msw/197 fsw but in some devices responded to pressure changes. There was no pacing dysfunction or suppression of the sensor response despite the high incidence of case distortion at 60 msw/197 fsw. As a general rule, diving should not be allowed at depths greater than 20 msw/65 fsw.

Diving↗