Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12449153

A simple model for straggling evaluation.

Abstract

Some straggling models had largely been abandoned in favor of Monte Carlo simulations of straggling which are accurate but time consuming, limiting their application in practice. The difficulty of simple analytic models is the failure to give accurate values past 85% of the particle range. A simple model is derived herein based on a second order approximation upon which rapid analysis tools are developed for improved understanding of material charged particle transmission properties.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J W Wilson, J Tweed, H Tai, R K Tripathi. 2002. A simple model for straggling evaluation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-583x(02)01028-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Processing of clustered DNA damage generates additional double-strand breaks in mammalian cells post-irradiation.

Clustered DNA damage sites, in which two or more lesions are formed within a few helical turns of the DNA after passage of a single radiation track, are signatures of DNA modifications induced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells. Mutant hamster cells (xrs-5), deficient in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), were irradiated at 37 degrees C to determine whether any additional double-strand breaks (DSBs) are formed during processing of gamma-radiation-induced DNA clustered damage sites. A class of non-DSB clustered DNA damage, corresponding to approximately 30% of the initial yield of DSBs, is converted into DSBs reflecting an artefact of preparation of genomic DNA for pulsed field gel electrophoresis. These clusters are removed within 4 min in both NHEJ-deficient and wild-type CHO cells. In xrs-5 cells, a proportion of non-DSB clustered DNA damage, representing approximately 10% of the total yield of non-DSB clustered DNA damage sites, are also converted into DSBs within approximately 30 min post-gamma but not post-alpha irradiation through cellular processing at 37 degrees C. That the majority of radiation-induced non-DSB clustered DNA damage sites are resistant to conversion into DSBs may be biologically significant at environmental levels of radiation exposure, as a non-DSB clustered damage site rather than a DSB, which only constitutes a minor proportion, is more likely to be induced in irradiated cells.

Alpha Particles↗

Targeted alpha therapy in vivo: direct evidence for single cancer cell kill using 149Tb-rituximab.

This study demonstrates high-efficiency sterilisation of single cancer cells in a SCID mouse model of leukaemia using rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20, labelled with terbium-149, an alpha-emitting radionuclide. Radio-immunotherapy with 5.5 MBq labelled antibody conjugate (1.11 GBq/mg) 2 days after an intravenous graft of 5.10(6) Daudi cells resulted in tumour-free survival for >120 days in 89% of treated animals. In contrast, all control mice (no treatment or treated with 5 or 300 micro g unlabelled rituximab) developed lymphoma disease. At the end of the study period, 28.4%+/-4% of the long-lived daughter activity remained in the body, of which 91.1% was located in bone tissue and 6.3% in the liver. A relatively high daughter radioactivity concentration was found in the spleen (12%+/-2%/g), suggesting that the killed cancer cells are mainly eliminated through the spleen. This promising preliminary in vivo study suggests that targeted alpha therapy with (149)Tb is worthy of consideration as a new-generation radio-immunotherapeutic approach.

Alpha Particles↗

Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains.

Interactions between ends from different DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can produce tumorigenic chromosome translocations. Two theories for the juxta-position of DSBs in translocations, the static "contact-first" and the dynamic "breakage-first" theory, differ fundamentally in their requirement for DSB mobility. To determine whether or not DSB-containing chromosome domains are mobile and can interact, we introduced linear tracks of DSBs in nuclei. We observed changes in track morphology within minutes after DSB induction, indicating movement of the domains. In a subpopulation of cells, the domains clustered. Juxtaposition of different DSB-containing chromosome domains through clustering, which was most extensive in G1 phase cells, suggests an adhesion process in which we implicate the Mre11 complex. Our results support the breakage-first theory to explain the origin of chromosomal translocations.

Alpha Particles↗