Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12448781

A user interface model for navigation in virtual environments.

Márcio Serolli Pinho·Leandro Luís Dias·Carlos G Antunes Moreira·Emmanuel González Khodjaoghlanian·Gustavo Pizzini Becker·Lúcio Mauro Duarte
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

One of the most complicated tasks when working with three-dimensional virtual worlds is the navigation process. Usually, this process requires the use of buttons and key-sequences and the development of interaction metaphors that frequently make the interaction process artificial and inefficient. In these environments, very simple tasks, such as looking upward and downward, can became extremely complicated. To overcome these obstacles, this work presents an interaction model for three-dimensional virtual worlds, based on the interpretation of the natural gestures of a real user while he/she is walking in a real world. This model is an example of a non-WIMP (Window, Icon, Menu, Pointer) interface. To test this model, we created a device named "virtual bike." With this device, the user can navigate through the virtual environment exactly as if he were riding a real bike.

Explore related subjects

ComputersHumansUser-Computer InterfaceJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Márcio Serolli Pinho, Leandro Luís Dias, Carlos G Antunes Moreira, Emmanuel González Khodjaoghlanian, Gustavo Pizzini Becker, Lúcio Mauro Duarte. 2002. A user interface model for navigation in virtual environments.. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102761022869

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Computer-assisted generation of a protein-interaction database for nuclear receptors.

With the increasing amount of biological data available, automated methods for information retrieval become necessary. We employed computer-assisted text mining to retrieve all protein-protein interactions for nuclear receptors from MEDLINE in a systematic way. A dictionary of protein names and of terms denoting interactions was generated, and trioccurrences of two protein names and one interaction term in one sentence were retrieved. Abstracts containing at least one such trioccurrence were manually checked by biologists to select the relevant interactions out of the automatically extracted data. In total, 4360 abstracts were retrieved containing data on protein interactions for nuclear receptors. The resulting database contains all reported protein interactions involving nuclear receptors from 1966 to September 2001. Remarkably, the annual increase in number of reported interactors for nuclear receptors has been following an exponential growth curve in the years 1991 to 2001. Apparent in the data set is the high complexity of protein interactions for nuclear receptors. The number of interactions correlates with the number of published papers for a given receptor, suggesting that the number of reported interactors is a reflection of the intensity of research dedicated to a given receptor. Indeed, comparison of the retrieved data to a systematic yeast two-hybrid-based interaction analysis suggests that most NRs are similar with respect to the number of interacting proteins. The data set obtained serves as a source for information on NR interactions, as well as a reference data set for the improvement of advanced text-mining methods.

Computers↗
PubMed2003

Performance of Web-based image distribution: client-oriented measurements.

The aim of this study was to define a clinically suitable personal computer (PC) configuration for Web-based image distribution and to assess the influence of different hard- and software configurations on the performance. Through specially developed software the time-to-display (TTD) for various PC configurations was measured. Different processor speeds, random access memory (RAM), screen resolutions, graphic adapters, network speeds, operating systems and examination types (computed radiography, CT, MRI) were evaluated, providing more than half a million measurements. Processor speed was the most relevant factor for the TTD; doubling the speed halved the TTD. Under processor speeds of 350 MHz, TTD mostly remained above 5 s for 1 CR or 16 CT images. Here Windows NT with lossy compression were superior. Processor speeds of 350 MHz and over delivered TTD <5 s. In this case Windows 2000 and lossless compression were preferable. Screen resolutions above 1280 x 1024 pixels increased the TTD mainly for CR images. The RAM amount, network speed and graphic adapter did not have a significant influence. The minimum threshold for clinical routine is any standard off-the-shelf PC better than Pentium II 350 MHz, 128 MB RAM; hence, high-end PC hardware is not required.

Computers↗