Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12390457

Selecting performance assessment methods for experienced physicians.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While much is now known about how to assess the competence of medical practitioners in a controlled environment, less is known about how to measure the performance in practice of experienced doctors working in their own environments. The performance of doctors depends increasingly on how well they function in teams and how well the health care system around them functions. METHODS: This paper reflects the combined experiences of a group of experienced education researchers and the results of literature searches on performance assessment methods. CONCLUSION: Measurement of competence is different to measurement of performance. Components of performance could be re-conceptualised within a different domain structure. Assessment methods may be of a different utility to that in competence assessment and, indeed, of different utility according to the purpose of the assessment. An exploration of the utility of potential performance assessment methods suggests significant gaps that indicate priority areas for research and development.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R B Hays, H A Davies, J D Beard, L J M Caldon, E A Farmer, P M Finucane, P McCrorie, D I Newble, L W T Schuwirth, G R Sibbald. 2002. Selecting performance assessment methods for experienced physicians.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01307.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A virtual reality simulator for objective assessment of surgeons' laparoscopic skill].

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate computed virtual reality simulation as a tool to assess laparoscopic skills and to establish whether the simulator allows differentiating between surgeons with different laparoscopic experience. METHODS: 27 physicians at the surgical department of the University of Marburg, Germany, with different experience in laparoscopic surgery were divided into three groups: experienced (group I), intermediate (group II), and novices (group III). Following a brief introduction to the virtual reality simulator (LapSim), each participant performed twice a training program consisting of seven tasks (examinations I and II). RESULTS: Comparison of experienced surgeons with less experienced laparoscopic physicians showed a significant (P<0.05) superiority of group I at examinations I and II in most exercises. The groups' difference was more obvious in examination II, since the technique was new for all participants during examination I. Tasks of low complexity in virtual reality such as camera navigation, which are performed by young, not yet responsible surgeons in real surgery, did not show significantly different results between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Differences in laparoscopic experience can be visualised with a virtual reality simulator, and thus a simulator is helpful for assessing surgeons' laparoscopic skills.

Clinical Competence↗