Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12376092

Quality indicators increase the reliability of microarray data.

Wolfgang Raffelsberger·Doulaye Dembélé·Mike G Neubauer·Marco M Gottardis·Hinrich Gronemeyer
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large-scale gene expression profiling with DNA microarrays opens new dimensions to molecular biology but still lacks the overall precision of traditional low-scale techniques. We developed a novel strategy of data processing linking search stringency to quality indicators for efficient detection of low-level, regulated genes. Using retinoid-induced differentiation of NB-4 promyelocytic cells, the variation of expression profiles between biological duplicates was studied and compared with the changes induced by all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) treatment. An analysis of 4320 genes showed that retinoic acid has mainly geneactivating function in NB-4 cells. Treatment with atRA for 18 hours induced metabolic genes that may be associated with cell differentiation and signaling factors triggering later events leading to apoptosis; cytokine genes were among the highest stimulated by atRA. Notably, we identified a regulatory loop inhibiting MYC action: as MYC was downregulated, a cognate repressor of MYC was upregulated.

Explore related subjects

Cluster AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisQuality Indicators, Health CareRegression AnalysisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wolfgang Raffelsberger, Doulaye Dembélé, Mike G Neubauer, Marco M Gottardis, Hinrich Gronemeyer. 2002. Quality indicators increase the reliability of microarray data.. https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.2002.6848

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

Clustering individuals using INMTD: a novel versatile multi-view embedding framework integrating omics and imaging data.

MOTIVATION: Combining omics and images can lead to a more comprehensive clustering of individuals than classic single-view approaches. Among the various approaches for multi-view clustering, nonnegative matrix tri-factorization (NMTF) and nonnegative Tucker decomposition (NTD) are advantageous in learning low-rank embeddings with promising interpretability. Besides, there is a need to handle unwanted drivers of clusterings (i.e. confounders). RESULTS: In this work, we introduce a novel multi-view clustering method based on NMTF and NTD, named INMTD, which integrates omics and 3D imaging data to derive unconfounded subgroups of individuals. According to the adjusted Rand index, INMTD outperformed other clustering methods on a synthetic dataset with known clusters. In the application to real-life facial-genomic data, INMTD generated biologically relevant embeddings for individuals, genetics, and facial morphology. By removing confounded embedding vectors, we derived an unconfounded clustering with better internal and external quality; the genetic and facial annotations of each derived subgroup highlighted distinctive characteristics. In conclusion, INMTD can effectively integrate omics data and 3D images for unconfounded clustering with biologically meaningful interpretation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: INMTD is freely available at https://github.com/ZuqiLi/INMTD.

Cluster Analysis↗
PubMed2005

Fuzzy species among recombinogenic bacteria.

BACKGROUND: It is a matter of ongoing debate whether a universal species concept is possible for bacteria. Indeed, it is not clear whether closely related isolates of bacteria typically form discrete genotypic clusters that can be assigned as species. The most challenging test of whether species can be clearly delineated is provided by analysis of large populations of closely-related, highly recombinogenic, bacteria that colonise the same body site. We have used concatenated sequences of seven house-keeping loci from 770 strains of 11 named Neisseria species, and phylogenetic trees, to investigate whether genotypic clusters can be resolved among these recombinogenic bacteria and, if so, the extent to which they correspond to named species. RESULTS: Alleles at individual loci were widely distributed among the named species but this distorting effect of recombination was largely buffered by using concatenated sequences, which resolved clusters corresponding to the three species most numerous in the sample, N. meningitidis, N. lactamica and N. gonorrhoeae. A few isolates arose from the branch that separated N. meningitidis from N. lactamica leading us to describe these species as 'fuzzy'. CONCLUSION: A multilocus approach using large samples of closely related isolates delineates species even in the highly recombinogenic human Neisseria where individual loci are inadequate for the task. This approach should be applied by taxonomists to large samples of other groups of closely-related bacteria, and especially to those where species delineation has historically been difficult, to determine whether genotypic clusters can be delineated, and to guide the definition of species.

Cluster Analysis↗
PubMed2003

AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among aromatic grapevines (Vitis vinifera).

Genotypic diversity has been detected among aromatic grapevines (Vitis vinifera) by molecular markers (AFLPs). The 22 primer-pairs generated a total of 1,331 bands of which 564 (40%) were polymorphic over all the genotypes. The bootstrap analysis pointed out that a large number of polymorphic bands (200-400) has to be used for a better estimation of the genetic distances among genotypes; 383 polymorphic AFLP bands were used for the cluster and the principal coordinate analyses because they did not present missing data across all the genotypes. The cluster analysis (UPGMA), based on polymorphic AFLP markers, revealed no relationship between the Moscato and Malvasia grapevines. The Malvasias, unlike the Moscatos distinguished by their distinct muscat aroma, have to be considered a more complex group because it includes muscat and non-muscat grapevines. The principal coordinate analysis (PCO) confirmed the pattern of the cluster analysis only for those varieties which presented a low coefficient of dissimilarity, while for the other varieties there was no correspondence between the two analyses. The pattern of aggregation among aromatic grapevines in the cluster and principal coordinate analyses does not support any classification that might include an aromatic grapevine group in V. vinifera. Even though some synonyms and homonyms are present among aromatic grapevines (V. vinifera), genetic diversity exists among genotypes in AFLP markers.

Cluster Analysis↗