PubMed · 12374439
Crowded minds: the implicit bystander effect.
Abstract
Five studies merged the priming methodology with the bystander apathy literature and demonstrate how merely priming a social context at Time 1 leads to less helping behavior on a subsequent, completely unrelated task at Time 2. In Study 1, participants who imagined being with a group at Time 1 pledged significantly fewer dollars on a charity-giving measure at Time 2 than did those who imagined being alone with one other person. Studies 2-5 build converging evidence with hypothetical and real helping behavior measures and demonstrate that participants who imagine the presence of others show facilitation to words associated with unaccountable on a lexical decision task. Implications for social group research and the priming methodology are discussed.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Stephen M Garcia, Kim Weaver, Gordon B Moskowitz, John M Darley. 2002. Crowded minds: the implicit bystander effect.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12374439/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.