Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12361172

Adaptive optics visual simulator.

Enrique J Fernández·Silvestre Manzanera·Patricia Piers·Pablo Artal
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a prototype instrument that uses adaptive optics to introduce virtually any desired aberration profile in a subject's eye. At the same time, the instrument could be used to evaluate the subject's spatial vision for each controlled aberration profile. This "aberration testing station" or "visual simulator" allows us to study the relationship between specific aberrations and visual quality. METHODS: The apparatus uses infrared light to measure the wavefront aberration of the system plus the eye with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. Defocus is added (or removed) with a computer-controlled, motorized optometer, while higher order aberrations are introduced by a 37-channel membrane deformable mirror. A parallel viewing channel is used for visual testing with the instrument. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and other visual tests are performed under normal viewing for each desired aberration profile. RESULTS: The range of defocus that can be added is nearly unlimited, while the maximum amount of other aberration modes is restricted to approximately 0.5 microm, depending on mode. Pure modes or any selected combination of modes can be produced with high repeatability and precision (usually better than 0.05 microm), and the system works for pupil diameters up to 6 mm (with a natural pupil). CONCLUSIONS: The adaptive optics visual simulator is a powerful, non-invasive tool to evaluate how aberrations affect vision. In addition, it can be used for the interactive design and testing of new ophthalmic devices, and for the simulation of visual outcomes in customized refractive surgery.

Explore related subjects

AstigmatismCorneaDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalHumansOptics and PhotonicsRefractive ErrorsVisual AcuityJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Enrique J Fernández, Silvestre Manzanera, Patricia Piers, Pablo Artal. Adaptive optics visual simulator.. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597x-20020901-27

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Mathematical model of corneal surface smoothing after laser refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To construct a quantitative model of corneal surface smoothing after laser ablation for refractive correction. DESIGN: Experimental study, interventional case series, and meta-analysis of literature. METHODS: A theory of epithelial smoothing in response to corneal contour change is derived from differential equations that describe epithelial migration, growth, and loss. Computer simulations calculate the effects on postoperative epithelial thickness, topography, refraction, and spherical aberration. Model parameter is matched with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcome in literature and in a retrospective study of primary spherical myopic (77 eyes) and hyperopic (19 eyes) corrections. Surgically induced refractive change was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Simulated epithelial remodeling after myopic ablation produces central epithelial thickening, reduction in achieved correction, and induction of oblate spherical aberration. Simulation of hyperopic ablation shows peripheral epithelial thickening, a larger reduction in correction, and induction of prolate spherical aberration. Simulation using a minus cylinder laser ablation pattern shows decreased astigmatism correction and increased hyperopic shift. In the LASIK series, linear regression of achieved correction vs ablation setting in hyperopic and minus cylinder corrections shows slopes of 0.97, 0.71, and 0.74, respectively. These clinical results match model predictions when the smoothing constant is set at 0.32, 0.63, and 0.55 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial thickness modulations after ablation can be modeled mathematically to explain clinically observed regression and induction of aberration. The cornea appears to smooth over ablated features smaller than approximately 0.5 mm. The model provides an approach for designing ablation patterns that precompensate for the smoothing to improve final outcome.

Astigmatism↗
PubMed2003

Visual dysfunction in artists.

The representation of the world provided by an artist is often modified by abnormalities in the visual pathways. Some artists have used these distortions to create a particular style. Controversy surrounds earlier artists whose visual function was not well documented historically. Drugs and psychiatric disease may also modify the artist's imagery.

Astigmatism↗
PubMed2003

Image size magnification and power and dilation factors for optical instruments in general.

Traditional treatments of spectacle magnification for distant objects consider only stigmatic spectacle lenses and they compare the retinal image size in a refractively fully compensated eye with the image size in the uncompensated eye. Spectacle magnification is expressed as a product of two factors, the power and shape factors of the lens. The power factor depends on the position of the entrance pupil of the eye. For an eye with an astigmatic cornea, however, the position of the entrance pupil is not well defined. Thus, the traditional approach to spectacle magnification does not generalize properly to allow for astigmatism. Within the constraints of linear optics and subject to the restriction that the eye's iris remains the aperture stop, this paper provides a complete, unified and exact treatment for optical instruments in general. It compares retinal image size in a generalized sense (including image shape and orientation) for any instrument in front of an eye with that of the eye alone irrespective of whether the instrument compensates or not. The approach does not make use of the concept of the entrance pupil at all and it allows for astigmatism and for non-alignment of refracting elements in the instrument and in the eye. The concept of spectacle magnification generalizes to the concept of instrument size magnification. Instrument size magnification can be expressed as the product of two matrix factors one of which can be interpreted as a power factor (as back-vertex power) and the other factor for which the name dilation factor is more appropriate in general. The general treatment is then applied to a number of special cases including afocal instruments, spectacle lenses (including obliquely crossing thick bitoric lenses), contact lenses, stigmatic systems and stigmatic eyes. In the case of spectacle lenses, the dilation factor reduces to the usual shape factor.

Astigmatism↗