Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12355941

[Urology].

Shiro Hinotsu·Hideyuki Akaza
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We reviewed comparative clinical studies for prostate cancer and bladder cancer performed in Japan. A systematic search was done using PubMed and Icyushi WEB to find randomized clinical trials and the result was verified. Each manuscript was summarized according to the seven items of stage, entry period, exposure, endpoint, sample size, method of randomization and result. Forty reports were found as randomized clinical trials for prostate cancer, and sixty-two reports were identified for bladder cancer. Most exposures for advanced prostate cancer were hormonal therapy involving intravesical instillation after transurethral resection for superficial bladder cancer. At minimum, we have clarified that large scale randomized trials have been conducted in Japan for both prostate cancer and bladder cancer.

Explore related subjects

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCystectomyFemaleHumansMaleProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegistriesSurvival AnalysisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shiro Hinotsu, Hideyuki Akaza. 2002. [Urology].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12355941/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.

The interpretation of between-group comparisons is facilitated by the creation of treatment groups that are similar to each other in baseline composition. To prevent treatment effects from being confounded with time effects, most trials use restricted randomization to force balance. An unintended consequence of these restrictions is that they create patterns that allow for the prediction of future treatment allocations, and hence selection bias, especially in unmasked trials. In fact, the more restrictive the allocation procedure, the greater the potential for selection bias. It was decided, in the context of a recent clinical trial comparing two dosing schedules of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer, that the randomized block procedure could not simultaneously protect sufficiently against both selection and chronological bias. In this paper we detail our development of the maximal procedure. The maximal procedure takes as input the extent of chronological bias allowed by the randomized block procedure, then matches it, but does so with fewer restrictions. This feature makes the maximal procedure more resistant to selection bias than the randomized block procedure is.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2003

[Experience with the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer in Hungary].

In the first phase of this study 34 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have been treated either with gemcitabine/cisplatin or gemcitabine/5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin combination. (Gemzar: 900 mg/m2, Cisplatin: 20 mg/m2, 5-FU: 750 mg/m2). Treatments were continued till tumor progression. There was no difference observed between the two protocols in the clinical response rates (PR=65%). On the other hand, a significant difference was found between the two protocols regarding the side effects. In the case of gemcitabine/5-FU neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia (as well as nausea and vomiting) were much less frequent compared to gemcitabine/cisplatin combination. Based on these data the efficacy of gemcitabine/5-FU combination was evaluated in 99 stage III, T1-4, N1 and stage IV, T1-4, N0-1, M1 pancreatic cancer patients throughout 364 treatment cycles. OR was achieved in 10% while stable disease in 52% of the cases. The average survival period was 8.33 months while the time to progression was 5.75 months. Based on these data we recommend gemcitabine/5-FU/leucovorin combination for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2003

Extraocular retinoblastoma: a 13-year experience.

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to evaluate two regimens of treatment and to describe clinical and epidemiologic characteristics in patients with extraocular retinoblastoma. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with extraocular retinoblastoma according to Childrens Cancer Group (CCG) classification were admitted to the Pediatric Department of the A. C. Camargo between 1987-2000. The age, gender, race, lag time, first clinical presentation, staging, laterality, and treatment regimen were analyzed. Treatment was comprised of cisplatin, teniposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide during the first treatment period (1987-1991) or cisplatin and teniposide with alternating courses of ifosfamide and etoposide during the second treatment period (1992-2000). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 32.9 months (range, 2-145 months). The mean lag time was 10.5 months. Forty-three patients were treated in the first period and 40 patients were treated in the second period. Locally advanced tumors (Class I-III) were present in 83.1% of the patients. There was a positive correlation between lag time and age for unilateral tumors (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.35; P = 0.006), whereas the correlation was negative for bilateral tumors (r = -0.12; P = 0.63). The 5-year overall survival was 55.1% in the first treatment period and 59.4% in the second treatment period (P = 0.69). No significant differences with regard to survival rates were noted for unilateral tumors between the two treatment periods (44.6 noted for unilateral tumors vs. 59.1 noted for unilateral tumors). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to a treatment regimen comprised of cisplatin, teniposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide did not appear to improve the survival of patients with extraocular retinoblastoma. Patients with dissemination to the central nervous system or metastatic disease remain incurable and die of progressive disease, despite the aggressive treatment. A multicenter trial should be considered to evaluate the best strategy for these situations.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗