Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12352103

Reporting medication errors through computerized medication administration.

Abstract

The incidence of medication errors has risen dramatically during the last decade to an alarming number. Nurses report only 5% of significant errors, those considered life threatening. Little research has been done related to medication errors at the administration stage or reporting methods. The purpose of this study was to compare medication error rate per 1,000 doses administered before and after the implementation of a bar code medication administration system. The study was conducted on two medical-surgical units at a midwest government hospital 12 months both before and after the implementation of the Bar Code Medication Administration system. The medication error rate per 1,000 doses administered by a nurse after implementation of the Bar Code Medication Administration system showed an 18% increase. The results probably do not indicate an increase in medication errors but rather an increase in the number of medication errors reported. This research highlights problems with programs evaluating medication errors and new technology implementation. Evaluators must have accurate baseline data before implementation. Past research has shown that the medication error rate has been underreported. In contrast to a staff reporting system, the computerization of medication administration improves the reporting system by reporting all errors. Once a more accurate error rate is known, new technology can be created, evaluated, and refined to reduce medication errors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Debra K Low, Jan V R Belcher. Reporting medication errors through computerized medication administration.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024665-200209000-00009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Reporting of adverse drug reactions by nurses.

Schemes for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions are important to post-marketing safety surveillance worldwide. In the UK, doctors, dentists, coroners, and pharmacists are allowed to report through the yellow card scheme, but nurses were not until October, 2002. We used a similar programme to assess the role of community and hospital nurses in reporting of adverse drug reactions. The proportion and quality of reports received from nurses was similar to that of those received from doctors: we received reports from one in seven nurses eligible to report, compared with one in eight doctors; 137 of 177 nurse reports and 676 of 984 doctor reports were judged to be appropriate according to regulatory authority criteria (95% CI for difference between proportions 1.4-15.0, z=2.3, p=0.02). Our findings suggest that nurses, who form the largest proportion of health-care staff in the UK, can play a valuable part in improvement of pharmacovigilance.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗

Update on adverse events following civilian smallpox vaccination--United States, 2003.

During January 24-April 4, 2003, smallpox vaccine was administered to 31,297 civilian health-care and public health workers in 54 jurisdictions as part of an effort to prepare the United States for a possible terrorist attack using smallpox virus. This report updates information on all vaccine-associated adverse events among civilians vaccinated since the beginning of the smallpox vaccination program and among contacts of vaccinees, received by CDC from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as of April 4.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗