Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12227217

Considering virtual colonoscopy.

Abstract

Virtual colonoscopy continues to show promise as a colorectal cancer screening test and is technically evolving rapidly. It has particular advantages with regard to acceptability by both radiologists and patients. Important steps to achieve implementation include clear delineation of all of the technical components necessary to produce consistent high performance and development of clear-cut recommendations for interpretation and management of polyps of various sizes and the range of extracolonic findings identified. Development of an effective methodology to perform the test without bowel preparation or demonstration of cost-effectiveness for identification and treatment of one or more significant extracolonic diseases would be major breakthroughs, provided they are still accompanied by effective detection of significant colon neoplasms. Issues regarding general effectiveness and cost-effectiveness must be resolved before virtual colonoscopy is endorsed for widespread colorectal cancer screening or utilized for that purpose.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Douglas K Rex. 2002. Considering virtual colonoscopy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12227217/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Early detection of colorectal tumors: CT or MRI?].

Cancer screening is currently offered for the organs breast, prostate, cervix and colorectum. With progressing technique in computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the colorectum can be increasingly better assessed. Because in CT and MRI also other organs are imaged with the colorectum, a colorectal screening automatically becomes a multiorgan screening. CT and MRI protocols designed for early detection of colorectal tumors are presented and discussed with regard to monoorganscreening (in CT: low dose, no i.v. contrast) and multiorganscreening (in CT: diagnostic dose for neighboured organs with i.v. contrast). More information under http://www.multiorganscreening.org.

Colonic Polyps↗

Effect of hysterectomy status on polyp detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Flexible sigmoidoscopy with polypectomy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer by removal of premalignant lesions. Factors that reduce the area examined by flexible sigmoidoscopy may reduce its benefit. The aim of this study was to determine whether hysterectomy affects completion and polyp detection rates at flexible sigmoidoscopy. METHODS: Within the setting of a multicenter, prospective, controlled trial of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy, patient and examination variables were compared by appropriate statistical methods for women between the ages of 55 and 64 years with and without a history of a hysterectomy. RESULTS: One quarter of women participants had undergone a hysterectomy. These women were more likely to have incomplete examinations (risk ratio [RR] of incomplete examination, 1.53; 95% CI [1.4, 1.6]). Flexible sigmoidoscopy was more difficult (p < 0.001), more painful (p < 0.001), and less extensive (46 cm vs. 48 cm insertion on average; p < 0.0001) in women who had undergone a hysterectomy. There was a significant trend toward lower relative detection rates of polyps and adenomas at more proximal sites (rectum, sigmoid colon, and proximal to sigmoid; respectively, p = 0.008, p = 0.009) in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Women who have undergone a hysterectomy have less extensive flexible sigmoidoscopy examinations, which are more difficult and more painful, than women without a hysterectomy. Hysterectomy is associated with a reduction in polyp detection rate in the sigmoid colon. This modality of screening may be less effective in women who have undergone a hysterectomy.

Colonic Polyps↗