Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12224164

Microlaparoscopic varicocelectomy.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the development of laparoscopic varicocelectomy from our initial description in 1986 based in the first pioneering works of K. Semm and to describe our latest microlaparoscopic technique that uses 3 mm instruments. METHODS: We use 3 mm reusable trocars with a specially designed telescope and instruments. One port is in the umbilicus the others are in the flanks at this level. Spermatic vessels are identified by firm traction of the testicle. The peritoneum is incised transversally at this level to dissect and ligate the two or three veins usually found here. To shorten operation time and improve results the vascular bundle is ligated en-bloc and when it is bulky, we divide it into two smaller bundles before tying the knot. RESULTS: Field of vision and image brightness is adequate and allows the operator to suture with great precision and ease. Large angular movements of the 3 mm telescope should be made with its trocar. Image brightness depends on the proximity of the lens to the structure being inspected; it worsens when the lens is withdrawn even slightly. Reusable 3 mm instruments can be used hundreds of times and with care they have sufficient strength to permit tying tight even en-bloc ligatures of vascular bundles. Operating times are between 20 and 25 minutes, bilateral operations need about 10 minutes more. Wounds made by the 3 mm trocars are usually self-closing and rarely need to stitch. CONCLUSIONS: Many authors confirm that since we first described the technique 15 years ago laparoscopic varicocelectomy is a safe, quick and easy minimal invasive procedure, less expensive than open techniques or occlusion under radiological control. The Palomo retroperitoneal approach using en-bloc ligatures of the vascular pedicle laparoscopically shortens operative times, the percentage of failures is minimum and postoperative testicular volumes and sperm counts increase. The microlaparoscopic technique not only reduces surgical aggression, but also the risk of complications is less and it does not increase operative difficulty or operation time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eduardo Sánchez de Badajoz, Adolfo Jiménez Garrido. Microlaparoscopic varicocelectomy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12224164/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Microchip PCR.

Miniaturization of genetic tests has become an important goal. This review surveys the current progress towards the miniaturization of tests based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). It examines the different types of PCR microchip designs, fabrication methods,and the components of a microchip PCR device. It also discusses the problems attributable to surface chemistry of microchip components (inhibition of PCR), and the static and dynamic surface passivation strategies developed for the solution of these difficulties

Equipment Design↗

Fluid leakage past tracheal tube cuffs: evaluation of the new Microcuff endotracheal tube.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the recently introduced Microcuff endotracheal tube HVLP ICU featuring an ultrathin (7-microm) polyurethane cuff membrane with endotracheal tubes from different manufacturers regarding fluid leakage past the tube cuff. DESIGN: In vitro setup. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The following endotracheal tubes (ID 7.5 mm) were compared: Mallinckrodt HiLo, Microcuff HVLP ICU, Portex Profile Soft Seal, Rüsch Super Safety Clear, and Sheridan CF. A vertical PVC trachea model (ID 20 mm) was intubated, and cuffs were inflated to 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 60 cmH2O. Colored water (5 ml) was added to the top of the cuff. The amount of leaked fluid past the tube cuff within 5, 10, and 60 min was recorded. Experiments were performed four times using two examples of each tube brand. Fluid leakage past tube cuffs occurred in all conventional endotracheal tubes at cuff pressures from 10 to 60 cmH2O. In the Microcuff tube cuff pressure fluid leakage was observed within 10 min only at 10 cmH2O. Results with the Microcuff tube were significantly better than all other tube brands at cuff pressures of 10-30 cmH2O. CONCLUSIONS: Within the acceptable upper limit for tracheal cuff pressure (25-30 cmH2O) the Microcuff endotracheal tube was the only one of the tested tubes to prevent fluid leakage in our in vitro setup. In vivo studies are required to confirm these findings.

Equipment Design↗