Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12141022

Improving patient satisfaction: a control chart case study.

Abstract

Health care providers both in inpatient and outpatient settings commonly use patient satisfaction surveys. However, when the surveys are administered and the results are interpreted without attention to sound scientific methodology, the findings may be useless and even misleading. As a result, money and resources are wasted. To use surveys to improve patient care, providers must first obtain high-quality data. This requires choosing an instrument that is valid and reliable, employing an appropriate and credible sampling method, and obtaining a representative response rate. Providers are then faced with the difficult challenge of interpreting and responding to the survey findings. This article addresses this latter task by presenting a case study that demonstrates how control charts can be used to interpret survey findings, develop improvement plans, and assess the effectiveness of these plans.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Raymond G Carey. 2002. Improving patient satisfaction: a control chart case study.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004479-200207000-00011

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Strategies to reduce HIV risk behavior in HIV primary care clinics: brief provider messages and specialist intervention.

Reducing HIV transmission is a critical goal worldwide, prompting new strategies to slow the spread of the virus. This paper describes the theoretical underpinnings of the Comprehensive Harm Reduction Protocol (CHRP) and the process of its implementation in one large urban HIV clinic and two smaller rural primary care clinics. Patients enrolled in CHRP complete the Risk Diagnostic Questionnaire (RDQ), self-reporting HIV transmission risk behavior at most clinic visits. Clinicians review RDQs to trigger dialogue using motivational interviewing and the stages of health behavior change to reduce high-risk behaviors (drug use, alcohol use, or high-risk sexual behavior). In the ongoing evaluation study, CHRP patients receive two provider-only visits before being randomized to continue with provider brief prevention messages only or to receive additional intensive counseling with a risk-reduction specialist following the provider visit. If outcome data support one or both interventions, CHRP could be a useful model for widespread adoption. Observations from the implementation of this protocol are presented in order to facilitate the adoption of this protocol in interested clinics. Later, results of the evaluation of the implementation of the protocol may have value in developing prevention policy in HIV treatment clinics.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗