Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12109006

Multidimensional data visualization.

Abstract

Historically, data visualization has been limited primarily to two dimensions (e.g., histograms or scatter plots). Available software packages (e.g., Data Desk 6.1, MatLab 6.1, SAS-JMP 4.04, SPSS 10.0) are capable of producing three-dimensional scatter plots with (varying degrees of) user interactivity. We constructed our own data visualization application with the Visualization Toolkit (Schroeder, Martin, & Lorensen, 1998) and Tcl/Tk to display multivariate data through the application of glyphs (Ware, 2000). A glyph is a visual object onto which many data parameters may be mapped, each with a different visual attribute (e.g., size or color). We used our Multi-Dimensional data Viewer to explore data from several psycholinguistic experiments. The graphical interface provides flexibility when users dynamically explore the multidimensional image rendered from raw experimental data. We highlight advantages of multidimensional data visualization and consider some potential limitations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matthew J Pastizzo, Robert F Erbacher, Laurie B Feldman. 2002. Multidimensional data visualization.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195437

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Influence of monitor luminance change on observer performance for detection of abnormalities depicted on chest radiographs.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate how changes in luminance affect the detection accuracy of radiologists viewing chest radiograph images on high-resolution CRT monitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen radiologists performed a detection task for 11 chest radiograph images with simulated nodules on a monitor with 11 luminance conditions (the maximum luminance ranges from 157.4-369.0 candela/m2) simulating CRT degraded by long-term usage, under the ambient illumination of 200 lux; the observation order was always from the darkest to the brightest. RESULTS: There was a statistically reliable effect of the 11 monitor display conditions on the detection of nodules (P < 0.001). In the conditions in which the maximum luminance of the CRT was 60.7% or below that of the standard display luminance, the correctly detected nodule number reliably deteriorated. CONCLUSIONS: The luminance change in CRT monitor display under long-term usage will have a detrimental effect on nodule detection performance in chest radiograph images.

Data Display↗