Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12085793

Does protein benefit bone density?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2002. Does protein benefit bone density?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12085793/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Is there a causal relationship between resistin levels and bone mineral density, fracture occurrence? A mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: In a great many of observational studies, whether there is a relevance of resistin levels on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture occurrence has been inconsistently reported, and the causality is unclear. METHODS: We aim to assess the resistin levels on BMD and fracture occurrence within a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Exposure and outcome data were derived from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) Open genome wide association studies (GWAS) database. Screening of instrumental variables (IVs) was performed subject to conditions of relevance, exclusivity, and independence. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was our primary method for MR analysis based on harmonized data. Weighted median and MR-Egger were chosen to evaluate the robustness of the results of IVW. Simultaneously, heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were also assessed and the direction of potential causality was detected by MR Steiger. Multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis was used to identify whether confounding factors affected the reliability of the results. RESULTS: After Bonferroni correction, the results showed a suggestively positive causality between resistin levels and total body BMD (TB-BMD) in European populations over the age of 60 [β(95%CI): 0.093(0.021, 0.165), P = 0.011]. The weighted median [β(95%CI): 0.111(0.067, 0.213), P = 0.035] and MR-Egger [β(95%CI): 0.162(0.025, 0.2983), P = 0.040] results demonstrate the robustness of the IVW results. No presence of pleiotropy or heterogeneity was detected between them. MR Steiger supports the causal inference result and MVMR suggests its direct effect. CONCLUSIONS: In European population older than 60 years, genetically predicted higher levels of resistin were associated with higher TB-BMD. A significant causality between resistin levels on BMD at different sites, fracture in certain parts of the body, and BMD in four different age groups between 0-60 years of age was not found in our study.

Bone Density↗

Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with bone mineral density in postmenopausal women of Hellenic origin.

OBJECTIVES: There are numerous indications that genetic factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, a common condition characterized by reduced bone mass and increased fracture risk. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene has been suggested as a possible candidate gene for the regulation of bone mass but the relationship between VDR polymorphisms and bone mineral density (BMD) is controversial and has not been confirmed by all workers in different ethnic groups studied. METHODS: In order to evaluate the contribution of the VDR alleles in bone mass loss, the BsmI, ApaI and TaqI polymorphisms in the VDR gene were studied in 126 postmenopausal women. RESULTS: It was found that the bb, aa and TT genotypes and the bAT and baT haplotypes were associated with a lower BMD measured at the forearm. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis reveals a significant association between VDR gene alleles and bone mass in the population studied.

Bone Density↗

Factors affecting bone loss around menopause in women without HRT: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated the effects of menopause and other putative bone loss modifying factors on bone mineral density (BMD) change. METHODS: The study population, 396 healthy women aged 48-59 years with no history of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use or any bone affecting disease or medications, was selected from a random sample (n=2025) of the OSTPRE-study cohort (n=13100) in Kuopio, Finland. BMD at lumbar spine (LS) and three areas of proximal femur (femoral neck (FN), Ward's triangle (W), trochanter (T)) was measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry at baseline in 1989-1991 and at 5 years in 1994-1997. RESULTS: 116 women who reported the beginning of menopause during the follow-up (perimenopausal) had the greatest mean annual bone loss (-1.22%/year (LS), -0.87% year (FN), -1.14%/year (W), -0.36%/year (T)). In women under 5 years postmenopausal at baseline (early postmenopausal, n=172) bone loss rate was significantly lower than in perimenopausal women. In women over 5 years postmenopausal at baseline (late postmenopausal, n=108) bone loss rate was significantly further decreased only at lumbar spine. In peri- and postmenopausal women the annual BMD change was best described as a trinomial function of the duration of menopause at all sites (P<0.03). Of the life-style factors studied protective effects were found in weight increase in both spinal and femoral bone (P=0.010/P<0.001), high baseline weight in spine (P<0.001) and high grip strength in femoral neck (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: The beginning of menopause is accompanied by significant bone loss, which decreases in later menopause. Few other physiological and life-style factors were found to significantly contribute to this phenomenon.

Bone Density↗