Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12079184

Setting specifications for potency assays--basic principles.

Abstract

To develop any biological therapeutic successfully, it is necessary to characterise the product thoroughly, both physicochemically and biologically. To ensure that consistency of production is maintained, some level of control is required to limit the variability of the product from batch to batch. This premise forms the basis of specification setting. The biological activity or potency of the product must be appropriately assessed through a functional assay unless specifically justified otherwise e.g. for binding proteins where binding has been correlated with biological activity. Biological assays are particularly prone to assay variability and therefore it is necessary to design and execute the assay to reduce variability as much as possible while providing a statistically valid measure of the reproducibility of potency estimates. Therefore, specifications for potency should only be derived following establishment of a well validated and controlled bioassay and should include some measure of the variability of the estimate in addition to the actual potency estimate itself. The limits applied to those specifications need to reflect the true batch to batch consistency of the product, its nature and toxicity as well as its intended use.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A R Mire-Sluis. 2002. Setting specifications for potency assays--basic principles.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12079184/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Poly(2-alkylacrylic acid) polymers deliver molecules to the cytosol by pH-sensitive disruption of endosomal vesicles.

The permeability barrier posed by cell membranes represents a challenge for the delivery of hydrophilic molecules into cells. We previously proposed that poly(2-alkylacrylic acid)s are endocytosed by cells into acidified vesicles and are there triggered by low pH to disrupt membranes and release the contents of endosomes/lysosomes to the cytosol. If this hypothesis is correct, these polymers could be valuable in drug-delivery applications. The present paper reports functional comparisons of a family of three poly(2-alkylacrylic acid)s. Poly(2-propylacrylic acid) (PPAA), poly(2-ethylacrylic acid) (PEAA) and poly(2-methylacrylic acid) (PMAA) were compared in red-blood-cell haemolysis assays and in a lipoplex (liposome-DNA complex) assay. We also directly examined the ability of these polymers to disrupt endosomes and lysosomes in cultured human cells. Our results show that: (i) unlike membrane-disruptive peptides, the endosomal-disruptive ability of poly(2-alkylacrylic acid)s cannot necessarily be predicted from their haemolytic activity at low pH, (ii) PPAA (but not PEAA or PMAA) potently facilitates gene transfection by cationic lipoplexes and (iii) endocytosed poly(2-alkylacrylic acid)s are triggered by luminal acidification to selectively disrupt endosomes (not lysosomes) and release their contents to the cytosol. These results will facilitate the rational design of future endosomal-disrupting polymers for drug delivery.

Biological Assay↗

DNA damaging activity of ellagic acid derivatives.

A strain of yeast rendered repair deficient by the conditional expression of the RAD52 locus was used to search for natural products capable of damaging DNA. Four ellagic acid derivatives, namely 3,3'-dimethyl-4'-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl ellagic acid (1), 3,3',4-trimethyl-4'-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl ellagic acid (2), 3'-methyl-3,4-O,O-methylidene ellagic acid (3) and 3'-methyl-3,4-O,O-methylidene-4'-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl ellagic acid (4), were identified by this assay as DNA damaging natural principles from several plants, including Alangium javanicum, Anisophyllea apetala, Crypteronia paniculata, Mouririi sp. and Scholtzia parviflora. Although none of the isolated principles mediated frank strand scission of DNA in vitro, all of them potently inhibited the growth of yeast in the absence of expression of RAD52.

Biological Assay↗

Combination ecotoxicity and testing of common chemical discharges to sewer using the Vibrio fischeri luminescence bioassay.

In order to investigate possible synergistic or antagonistic (more or less than additive) toxicity effects, mixtures of chemicals were tested in water using a microbial bioassay. Ten toxicants (3,4-dichloroaniline, 3,5-dichlorophenol, cadmium, chromium, copper, Lindane, linear alkylbenzene sulphonate, pentachlorophenol, toluene, zinc) were chosen on the basis of their common occurrence in industrial effluents within local waste water treatment plants. These toxicants also cover a wide range of modes of toxic action, namely, polar and non-polar narcosis, membrane disruption, respiratory disruption, uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation, biochemical disruption and enzyme inhibition. Efficient screening for possible combination toxicity between toxicants involved testing the chemicals both singly and in triplet combinations. The triplets were based on four replicates of a balanced incomplete block design (BIB). A standardised Vibrio fischeri rapid toxicity bioluminescence assay was used. The combinations tested showed that only one mixture was found to be significantly more toxic than expected from the pure single-toxicant results. Two triplets were significantly less toxic. Further tests on the more toxic triplet showed that the effect was due to only one of the 45 pairs originally screened. It is concluded that synergistic effects in combinations of toxicants are rather rare in bioluminescence systems utilising common effluents discharged to sewer.

Biological Assay↗