Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12023559

Rasch models overview.

Abstract

This overview of Rasch measurement models begins with a conceptualization of our continuous experiences that are often captured as discrete observations. It goes on to discuss the properties that are require of measures if they are to transcend the occasion in which they were collected, and concludes with a discussion the spiral of inferential development. This is followed by a discussion of the mathematical properties of the Rasch family of models that allow the transformation of discrete deterministic counts into continuous probabilistic abstractions on which science is based. The overview concludes with a discussion of six of the family of Rasch models, Binomial Trials, Poisson Counts, Rating Scale, Partial Credit, and Ranks and the types of data for which these models are appropriate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B D Wright, M Mok. 2000. Rasch models overview.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12023559/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Truncated negative binomial mixed regression modelling of ischaemic stroke hospitalizations.

A zero-truncated negative binomial mixed regression model is presented to analyse overdispersed positive count data. The study is motivated by the determination of pertinent risk factors associated with ischaemic stroke hospitalizations. Random effects are incorporated in the linear predictor to adjust for inter-hospital variations and the dependency of clustered observations using the generalized linear mixed model approach. The method assists hospital administrators and clinicians to estimate the number of subsequent readmissions based on characteristics of the patient at the index stroke. The findings have important implications on resource usage, rehabilitation planning and management of acute stroke care.

Binomial Distribution↗

[Evaluation of continuing medical education (CME) in print media].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In order to achieve points for the CME certificate of the German Medical Council ("Arztekammer") the reader of a CME article in a medical journal has to fill in an evaluation form that includes knowledge assessment. This article summarizes the data of the first ten CME presentations in the "Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift". METHODS: 4481 completed data sets were evaluated by chi-square and binomial tests using SPSS version 10.0. RESULTS: 85% of the participants were specialists, mainly in internal medicine or surgery: those working in private practice or a hospital took part. The great majority had received their licence one to 30 years ago. The topics dealt with diseases which were not uniformly often seen in clinical practice. The individually perceived changes in the strategy of diagnosis and therapy, induced by the CME article, was mainly dependent on qualification and specialization of the reader as well as on the frequency, with which the reader had been treating the respective disorder. The articles were appreciated by specialists as well as by non-specialists. Knowledge assessment was largely made on the basis of the article alone and was successfully passed by nearly 90% of the participants. CONCLUSION: For the first time this article provides detailed data on CME activities in a nation-wide available German medical journal and thus forms the basis for discussing further the definition of quality criteria for CME articles in medical journals.

Binomial Distribution↗