Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12018696

Colonoscopy.

A Leslie·R J C Steele
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Colonoscopy is now the gold standard method for investigating most colonic symptoms. However, it is a demanding procedure that can be associated with low completion rates and significant complications, and it requires considerable skill to perform colonoscopy consistently well and safely. In this article, the key steps in performing colonoscopy are described with a view to providing the trainee with a logical sequence of manoeuvres on which to base a sound technique.

Explore related subjects

ColonoscopesColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsGuidelines as TopicHumansJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Leslie, R J C Steele. 2002. Colonoscopy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12018696/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

A novel approach to endoscopic colorectal mucosal resection using a three-channel outer tube and multiple forceps: an experimental assessment.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has limitations both anatomically and technically when it is done using the conventional snare wire method. The aim of this study was to develop a new method and instrument for colorectal EMR. METHODS: A total of 21 EMR procedures were done using ten surgical specimens. Saline was injected into the normal submucosa of freshly resected colorectal specimens to prepare a pseudotumor. EMR was performed experimentally by employing a three-channel outer tube with three forceps and a colonoscope with a needle-type precutting knife. This method was assessed in terms of safety and the size of the resected specimens. RESULTS: Perforation occurred only twice in the initial stage of this study. The size of the specimens resected by EMR was 28-39 mm (long diameter 34.8+/-3.11), by 22-28 mm (short diameter 25.8+/-2.07). CONCLUSION: This method can achieve safety and en bloc mucosal resection to the submucosal layer. This novel approach may be promising for clinical application as a new form of endoscopic surgery.

Colonoscopes↗
PubMed2001

Determination of glutaraldehyde residues on flexible endoscopes after chemothermal treatment in an endoscope washer-disinfector.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Although there are several cases of glutaraldehyde-induced colitis following colonoscopy there is only one study on residues after disinfecting. Our report describes the determination of water-soluble glutaraldehyde residues after processing endoscopes with a glutaraldehyde-containing disinfectant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A gastroscope and a colonoscope were processed in a washer-disinfector and then immersed in 201 of NaCl solution. Glutaraldehyde was determined by high performance liquid chromatography in 84 samples. Samples were taken after immersing the endoscopes for 5 h and 24 h with and without rinsing the channels. RESULTS: After 5 h and with the channels having been rinsed, the median for colonoscopes was only 0.409 mg/l. The highest level of glutaraldehyde was 0.846 mg/l. CONCLUSIONS: After endoscopes have been processed in the washer-disinfector there is no risk of a glutaraldehyde-induced colitis, proctitis or diarrhoea.

Colonoscopes↗