PubMed · 11971360
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B Hehir. 2000-10-04. SOR points.. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.15.3.24.s42
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential effect of educational intervention on episiotomy practice. STUDY DESIGN: A survey of the attitude of obstetrical caregivers toward episiotomy was conducted among obstetricians and midwives in the three public hospitals in Haifa. Data regarding episiotomy rates was collected for the years 2001-2003. At the beginning of 2002, lectures on the risks and benefits of episiotomy were given in two hospitals. Episiotomy rates before and after the lecture were compared. RESULTS: A significant and lasting reduction in episiotomy rates was observed in the two hospitals where lectures were given. There were no clinically significant and consistent changes in the episiotomy practices in the third hospital. CONCLUSION: Education may play an important role in changing common medical practices, as in episiotomy. It was clearly shown that our beliefs are not always up to date. We call for periodic reassessment of all medical procedures, as common and accepted as they are.
RATIONALE: The goal of this study was to examine oncologists' attitudes towards recommending exercise to patients with cancer during treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a national survey, all 659 practicing medical and radiation oncologists in Canada were sent a brief questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 46% (281/610). The majority of oncologists agreed that exercise was beneficial (62.0%), important (55.8%) and safe (63.1%) for patients with cancer during treatment. Forty-three percent of oncologists reported that they tried to recommend exercise to their patients when appropriate. Moreover, oncologists actually reported recommending exercise to 28% of their patients during the past month. Analyses also indicated significant differences between oncologists, with younger, female, and medical oncologists generally having more favorable attitudes towards exercise for patients with cancer than their older, male, and radiation oncology counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Oncologists have a favorable attitude toward recommending exercise to patients with cancer although several important barriers may prevent oncologists from providing exercise advice to their patients. Further research is required evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and strategies designed to improve oncologists' confidence and ability to advise their patients on exercise during oncology consultations.
BACKGROUND: Adherence to evidence-based adverse outcome prevention techniques is a critical factor in providing high-quality patient care, but many of these interventions are not used by physicians. It is unclear if surgeons' risk attitudes and reactions to uncertainty influence their use of these or other interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify studies evaluating the effects of physicians' risk attitudes, reactions to uncertainty or ambiguity, and personality traits on clinical decision making. RESULTS: A variety of instruments to assess risk attitude and reactions to uncertainty have been developed and tested among physicians involved in critical care and emergency medicine. Scoring systems distinguish risk averse and risk seeking practitioners. In many studies, these characteristics were related to clinical decision making in situations of uncertainty. For example, among patients evaluated in the emergency room for chest pain, "risk-seeking" physicians admitted significantly fewer patients who did not have acute myocardial infarction than risk-avoiding physicians (29% and 47% of patients admitted, respectively). In contrast, risk-seeking physicians were no more likely to discharge a patient who eventually was found to have an acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: There are very limited data on the extent to which surgical decision making is linked to risk taking behavior and "comfort with uncertainty". Understanding the behaviors, attitudes and beliefs that make up surgical "judgment" remains a challenge for those interested in influencing behavior.