Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11908050

Does prayer really help?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Leslie Furlow, Josie Lu O'Quinn. 2002. Does prayer really help?. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cnj.0000262210.32795.01

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Coronary plaque morphology and frequency of ulceration distant from culprit lesions in patients with unstable and stable presentation.

OBJECTIVE: Intravascular ultrasound studies describe ruptured coronary plaques at sites remote from the culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), suggesting multifocal plaque vulnerability. However, the role of intravascular ultrasound in the diagnosis of lesion vulnerability before rupture is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared morphology and frequency of ulceration of additional plaques proximal to the culprit lesion in 105 patients treated with emergent stenting during an evolving, acute MI in the CADILLAC study and 92 patients with stable/subacute presentation who underwent elective stenting. Additional plaques proximal to the culprit lesion were found in 52 (50%) and 54 (59%) patients in the acute MI and stable/subacute group, respectively. The prevalence of ulceration was significantly higher in the acute MI than in the stable/subacute group (19% versus 4%; P=0.014). However, there was no significant difference in other morphological lesion characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Additional plaques are frequently found adjacent to the culprit lesions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention independent of clinical presentation. The increased prevalence of plaque ulceration but otherwise similar morphology of additional lesions in patients with acute MI versus stable/subacute presentation demonstrates the limitations of imaging in the assessment of plaque vulnerability.

Angina Pectoris↗

Effect of cilostazol on vasomotor reactivity in patients with vasospastic angina pectoris.

We examined the effects of cilostazol on impaired coronary arterial responses in patients with vasospastic angina (VSA). Thirty patients who were diagnosed with VSA based on an acetylcholine provocation test and 10 subjects with normal coronary arteries were enrolled. The patients were divided into the following 3 groups: no antiplatelet agent treatment group, aspirin treatment, or cilostazol treatment groups. Coronary flow reserve (CFR), coronary flow volume at maximum hyperemia, and epicardial coronary artery diameter after administration of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) were examined using a Doppler flow wire before and 6 months after the start of this study. CFR, coronary flow volume at maximum hyperemia, and diameter changes by L-NMMA were significantly increased in the cilostazol treatment group compared with the other 2 groups. In conclusion, cilostazol increased CFR and flow-dependent coronary dilation; these changes were attributable to nitric oxide. Cilostazol may improve coronary vascular endothelial dysfunction and coronary hemodynamics in patients with VSA.

Angina Pectoris↗

Association between C-reactive protein levels and subsequent cardiac events among patients with stable angina treated with coronary artery stenting.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of elevated C-reactive protein levels in patients with stable angina who underwent coronary stenting. METHODS: We followed a consecutive series of 1152 patients with stable angina who had undergone coronary stenting. We measured baseline C-reactive protein levels before stenting with a high-sensitivity assay; 651 patients (57%) had elevated C-reactive protein levels (>5 mg/L). The primary endpoint was either death or myocardial infarction within 1 year after the procedure. Angiographic restenosis was defined as a > or =50% diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography. RESULTS: During the 1-year follow-up, 62 (9.5%) of the 651 patients with an elevated C-reactive protein level and 24 (4.8%) of the 501 patients with normal levels died or had a myocardial infarction (P = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis, elevated baseline C-reactive protein levels were associated with almost a twofold increase in the rate of death or myocardial infarction after coronary stenting (hazard ratio = 1.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 2.9). Most of the difference in the event rates developed within the first 30 days. Baseline C-reactive protein levels did not correlate with restenosis. CONCLUSION: Elevated preprocedural C-reactive protein levels are associated with a less favorable prognosis in patients with stable angina who undergo coronary stenting. The measurement of C-reactive protein levels in these patients may help to identify those who may benefit from a treatment strategy aimed at the attenuation of inflammation.

Angina Pectoris↗