Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11858468

Should nurses practise complementary therapies?

Abstract

This paper is based on the review of the literature that was undertaken as part of a Research Dissertation, submitted as part of an MSc in Nursing at Coventry University. The subsequent study was a comparison of Nurse and Non-nurse Aromatherapists, exploring their beliefs about the therapy and their reasons for practice. The author questions whether nurses should practise complementary therapies and if so why? If the nursing curriculum is to be developed to incorporate complementary therapies then we must be able to justify their inclusion in terms of patient outcomes, rather than in terms of meeting the needs of the nurse. The paper raises many questions, not all of which can be answered at this stage, but which can be considered and reflected on in depth.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Johnson. 2000. Should nurses practise complementary therapies?. https://doi.org/10.1054/ctnm.2000.0454

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Use of complementary and alternative medicine in epilepsy.

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has become much in vogue, and CAM practitioners have increased in tandem with this. The trend of using CAM for treating epilepsy does not differ from that in other medical conditions, with nearly one half of patients using CAM. In this article we review the major complementary and alternative medicines used for treatment of epilepsy. They include mind-body medicines such as reiki and yoga; biologic-based medicine such as herbal remedies, dietary supplements, and homeopathy; and manipulative-based medicine such as chiropractic. In the available literature, there is a sense of the merit of these therapies in epilepsy, but there is a paucity of research in these areas. Individualized therapies such as homeopathy and reiki cannot be compared with medicines in a conventional pharmaceutical model. Hence, many studies are inconclusive. In a science of double-blind, randomized controlled trials, appropriate designs and outcome measurements need to be tailored to CAM. This article explains the principles of the major CAM therapies in epilepsy, and discusses peer-reviewed literature where available. More effort needs to be put into future trials, with the assistance of qualified CAM professionals to ensure conformation to their therapeutic principles.

Aromatherapy↗