Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11838877

Professional development for dentists: patterns and their implications.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approaches to models of professional development for dentists continue to evolve. This study examined the participation and attitudes of dentists in non-formal and informal professional development and continuing dental education. METHODS: Two methodologies were utilised: a self-administered cross-sectional survey of dentists in Victoria, Australia (conducted October to December, 1994), and a review of the records of the Continuing Education Unit of the School of Dental Science at The University of Melbourne for 1995 to 1999. For the cross-sectional survey, the sampling frame was the register of dentists of the Dental Board of Victoria in 1994. RESULTS: From a sample of 616 dentists invited to participate, 396 usable questionnaires were returned (response rate, 66.8 per cent). The valid data indicated that 52.5 per cent of dentists belonged to a study group, 66.5 per cent subscribed to at least one dental journal (other than the Australian Dental Journal), 88.9 per cent discussed dental matters with colleagues regularly, 98.6 per cent personally assessed their own work, 13.3 per cent did not attend continuing education courses and 18.1 per cent did not complete any courses in the year preceding the survey. Participation patterns in continuing education courses were related to socio-demographic characteristics of dentists. Some support was apparent for flexible delivery options for professional development. CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of dentists in Victoria, Australia in professional development activities is high, with complex participation patterns. Whether these patterns adequately address their own and the community's needs for such activities is debatable. Such issues should impact on any regulatory models for professional development for dentists and the development and use of alternative continuing education modalities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H A Best, L B Messer. 2001. Professional development for dentists: patterns and their implications.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11838877/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗