Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11828783

Reducing major identification errors within a deployed phlebotomy process.

Abstract

To achieve a patient-focused care environment, many hospitals are moving phlebotomy from the laboratory to the nursing units. Although this move has benefits, it also can bring an increase in error rates. The Valley Hospital in Ridgewood, New Jersey, implemented the BD Dx System patient identification system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey) in an effort to reduce the incidence of phlebotomy errors. This article discusses how to identify key factors in deploying phlebotomy, to analyze the specimen collection process, to set baselines for identification of errors, to identify critical steps in the blood collection process for error reduction, and to reduce errors by using the new hand-held computer technology for patient and specimen identification.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lawrence J Bologna, Christine Lind, R Chris Riggs. Reducing major identification errors within a deployed phlebotomy process.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11828783/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An inexpensive modification of the laboratory computer display changes emergency physicians' work habits and perceptions.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Little is known about how the availability of laboratory data affects emergency physicians' practice habits and satisfaction. We modified our clinical information system to display laboratory test status with continuous updates, similar to an airport arrival display. The objective of this study was to determine whether the laboratory test status display altered emergency physicians' work habits and increased satisfaction compared with the time period before implementation of laboratory test status. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of emergency physicians' actual use of the clinical information system before and after implementation of the laboratory test status display. Emergency physicians were retrospectively surveyed regarding the effect of laboratory test status display on their practice habits and clinical information system use. Survey responses were matched with actual use of the clinical information system. Data were analyzed by using dependent t tests and Pearson correlation coefficients. The study was conducted at a university hospital. RESULTS: Clinical information system use by 46 emergency physicians was analyzed. Twenty-five surveys were returned (71.4% of available emergency physicians). All emergency physicians perceived fewer clinical information system log ons per day after laboratory test status display. The actual average decrease was 19%. Emergency physicians who reported the greatest decrease in log ons per day tended to have the greatest actual decrease (r =-0.36). There was no significant correlation between actual and perceived total time logged on (r =0.08). In regard to effect on emergency physicians' practice habits, 95% reported increased efficiency, 80% reported improved satisfaction with data access, and 65% reported improved communication with patients. CONCLUSION: An inexpensive computer modification, laboratory test status display, significantly increased subjective efficiency, changed work habits, and improved satisfaction regarding data access and patient communication among emergency physicians. Knowledge of the test queue changed emergency physician behavior and improved satisfaction.

Clinical Laboratory Information Systems↗

LOINC, a universal standard for identifying laboratory observations: a 5-year update.

The Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes (LOINC) database provides a universal code system for reporting laboratory and other clinical observations. Its purpose is to identify observations in electronic messages such as Health Level Seven (HL7) observation messages, so that when hospitals, health maintenance organizations, pharmaceutical manufacturers, researchers, and public health departments receive such messages from multiple sources, they can automatically file the results in the right slots of their medical records, research, and/or public health systems. For each observation, the database includes a code (of which 25 000 are laboratory test observations), a long formal name, a "short" 30-character name, and synonyms. The database comes with a mapping program called Regenstrief LOINC Mapping Assistant (RELMA(TM)) to assist the mapping of local test codes to LOINC codes and to facilitate browsing of the LOINC results. Both LOINC and RELMA are available at no cost from http://www.regenstrief.org/loinc/. The LOINC medical database carries records for >30 000 different observations. LOINC codes are being used by large reference laboratories and federal agencies, e.g., the CDC and the Department of Veterans Affairs, and are part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) attachment proposal. Internationally, they have been adopted in Switzerland, Hong Kong, Australia, and Canada, and by the German national standards organization, the Deutsches Instituts für Normung. Laboratories should include LOINC codes in their outbound HL7 messages so that clinical and research clients can easily integrate these results into their clinical and research repositories. Laboratories should also encourage instrument vendors to deliver LOINC codes in their instrument outputs and demand LOINC codes in HL7 messages they get from reference laboratories to avoid the need to lump so many referral tests under the "send out lab" code.

Clinical Laboratory Information Systems↗

Six-year trends in laboratory computer availability.

CONTEXT: Failure of a clinical laboratory computer system can disrupt work flow and charge capture and affect patient care. The first comprehensive survey of computer downtime was conducted in 1995 and demonstrated significant interinstitutional variation in system availability. Despite numerous changes in the laboratory and computer industries since 1995, no follow-up study has been reported. OBJECTIVES: To quantify current laboratory computer availability and compare it with 1995 performance. DESIGN: Ninety-seven laboratories prospectively recorded the frequency and duration of computer downtime during 30 days in 2001. Results were compared with 1995 survey data. RESULTS: For the median facility, the number of downtime episodes decreased from 8 events per 30 days during 1995 to 3 events per 30 days during 2001 (P <.01). The frequency of unscheduled downtime also improved, from a median of 2 to 0.5 events per 30 days (P <.01). Reduced downtime events were paralleled by reduced cumulative downtime (14.3 vs 4.0 hours per 30 days; P <.01). Improvements were not restricted to the median facility; laboratories performing in the bottom quartile in 2001 recorded substantially less downtime than laboratories in the bottom quartile in 1995. When the comparison was restricted to the 37 institutions that participated in both the 1995 and 2001 surveys, a significant reduction in overall downtime and unscheduled downtime events was still evident (P <.01). More recent installation of vendor software patches was associated with a reduced frequency of downtime events in the 2001 data set. CONCLUSION: Laboratory computer downtime was less frequent in 2001 than in 1995; industry performance appears to be improving.

Clinical Laboratory Information Systems↗