Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11808481

Defcon (defined contribution) world.

Abstract

Implementation of defined contribution will succeed in a competitive marketplace where providers set acceptable fees and risk levels, and consumers make informed choices based on personal values.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robin Blair. 2002. Defcon (defined contribution) world.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11808481/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Urban primary health care in Africa: a comparative analysis of city-wide public sector projects in Lusaka and Dar es Salaam.

Since the 1980s, a number of health system interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa have targeted urban areas, reflecting increasing attention to the contextual contrasts between urban and rural health settings. This article compares attempts in two projects-in Zambia and Tanzania-to strengthen urban primary health care in the public sector and make it more inclusive in a dual sense: making quality services more accessible to the poor; and fostering community involvement in health care and health-related activity. The paper reveals that the projects have produced many similar outcomes (both positive and negative), despite differences in their managerial arrangements. After identifying issues that may need to be considered in other health initiatives, the discussion revisits the urban/rural dimension of health care in relation to three key aspects: the by-passing of primary services, community participation and inter-sectoral action.

Community Participation↗

Delivering consumer health information digitally: a comparison between the web and touchscreen kiosk.

Employing survey and web log data the study presented here compares the use and users of two digital health information platforms geared toward consumers-web-sites and touchscreen information kiosks. The kiosks featured are those supplied by InTouch With Health and the web-site is surgerydoor (some analysis of NHSDirect Online is also supplied). Problems of making direct comparisons between the two platforms are discussed and comparative figures provided. The two platforms were compared using the following metrics: page view time, session duration, number of sessions conducted, pages viewed per session, and topic/subject of pages viewed. Possible reasons for the differences between the two platforms are discussed, including the environment in which they are housed, the proximity of the platform to the user, the specific purpose of the individual platform, the different audiences served, the extent of delegation, the computer literacy of the audiences served, the quantity and comprehensiveness of the platform's information, and user's perceptions of authority. The research reminds and informs web-site and kiosk designers of the different audiences that they serve. The work reported here forms part of a Department of Health funded study which is evaluating digital health information provision to the consumer, in particular the use and impact of more than seventy heath kiosks located in all kinds of locations throughout the United Kingdom.

Community Participation↗