Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11803301

Microvascular decompression.

Abstract

Microvascular decompression (MVD) remains the only treatment of trigeminal neuralgia that directly addresses the presumed pathogenesis. It is a proven therapy, associated with the longest duration of pain relief while preserving facial sensation. The authors' premise for advocating early MVD is the belief that the disease's natural progression, in the absence of treatment, is toward the development of more atypical features that are refractory to treatment, signifying ongoing neuropathic injury. In an effort to more successfully select candidates for MVD, the authors have incorporated high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging into our preoperative algorithm, since it has proven extremely accurate in defining the neurovascular relations at the trigminal nerve complex. Microvascular decompression can only be recommended when it is performed with low rates of morbidity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Jeffrey Elias, Kim J Burchiel. Microvascular decompression.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200201000-00006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessment of trunk function in single and multi-level spinal stenosis: a prospective clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the biomechanical indicators of single- and multi-level stenosis and to determine the biomechanical outcome of selective conservative decompression. DESIGN: This study is a prospective clinical trial examining trunk function in spinal stenosis patients operated using a conservative procedure in an orthopaedic clinic. BACKGROUND: Although several clinical studies have examined the instability and motion characteristics of operated lumbar spinal canal stenosis, few if any studies have prospectively examined the biomechanical outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive pre- and post-operative trunk dynamometer strength and motion analysis tests were performed on 36 patients operated for lumbar canal stenosis. Surgical treatment efficacy was evaluated within a three variable crossed factorial design considering stenosis classification, number of operative levels, and changes in several trunk biomechanical outcomes from pre- to post-operative assessment. Patients were evaluated after a minimum one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Pre-operatively there were no differential effects associated with stenosis classification or number of operated levels. There was a significant post-operative increase in isometric trunk extension torque and flexion-extension power and a return to a more normal trunk extension-flexion torque ratio. Patients with mixed, single level stenosis demonstrated greater trunk extension power both pre- and post-operatively compared to other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis produced a marked improvement in the functional mechanical status of the low back. RELEVANCE: This study assists clinicians and researchers to understand trunk function following conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Decompression, Surgical↗

Spinal cord compression.

Back pain and suspected spinal cord compression remains one of the most frequent reasons for neurologic consultation in cancer patients. While treatment generally results in stabilization or improvement, early diagnosis remains the cornerstone of improving neurologic outcome. This article reviews the clinical features, differential diagnosis, and management of neoplastic epidural spinal cord compression.

Decompression, Surgical↗