Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11781898

[Not Available].

Abstract

Infertility means psychological stress for both sexes if their wish to have a child remains unfulfilled. The way men cope with infertility is partly due to the psychodynamics of their motives for parenting. In the paper, these motives are analysed by a combination of statistical and qualitative methods (content analysis). 137 Patients addressing an andrological outpatient department were asked to fill in a questionnaire of their motives for parenting. A cluster analysis yielded a four cluster solution, two of them being contrary to each other. One was interpreted as characterising "ambivalence towards the child", the other as "child-dependent or offspring-fixated". This interpretation was validated by qualitative data drawn from content analyses of psychodynamic interviews performed with a subgroup of 80 andrological patients. The results do have clinical relevance; they allow to better understand the psychological and psychodynamic sequelae of male infertility thus providing some cues for specific therapeutic interventions. In addition, the study is of methodological interest, because of the combination of quantitative and qualitative empirical methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Küchenhoff. 1999. [Not Available].. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.1999.45.4.333

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A new method to estimate quantitatively seminal vesicle and prostate gland contributions to ejaculate.

AIMS: We sought to optimize a quantitative noninvasive method to determine the concentration in their glands of origin of biochemical markers of compartments of the male genital tract as the first step towards validation of a novel method for estimation of drug concentrations in these male genital tract compartments. METHODS: Sixty-eight men participated. We compared four collection devices to split ejaculate into fractions. Fractions were assayed for fructose and prostate specific antigen (PSA) as unique markers of the seminal vesicle and prostate, respectively. Seminal vesicle fructose and prostatic PSA were estimated using a linear regression method, based on fructose-PSA axis intercepts, and compared with an older method which solves a simultaneous series of equations. RESULTS: A five-compartment collection device performed best with mean (95% confidence interval) PSA vs. fructose r(2) of 0.84 (0.71, 0.98, P < 0.001). Using resampling simulations, glandular PSA and fructose estimates were highly variable and often implausible when using only two fractions. Using our method, the prostate contributed 37-44% to the whole ejaculate and the seminal vesicle contributed 55-61%. The novel regression method was highly correlated (r(2) > or = 0.98) with older methods. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a noninvasive quantitative method of male genital tract biochemical marker estimation using a five-compartment tray to collect three to five ejaculate fractions. Our novel regression method is quantitative and more fully developed than older methods. This noninvasive method for determining glandular marker concentrations should be useful to provide quantitative estimates of drug concentrations in these glands.

Andrology↗