Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11781892

[Not Available].

G Schneider·G Heuft·A Kruse
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The paper examines differences between cases of psychogenic illness and noncases with regard to sociodemographic and health-related variables, coping and biographical reconstructions, evaluating their significance for psychic health in old age. A consecutive sample of 156 patients aged >60 treated for a variety of internal medical complaints in an acute geriatric hospital were examined with the help of comprehensive somatic diagnostics, the Impairment Score (IS), self-evaluation scales and a semistructured biographical interview. 27.5% (n = 43) of the study participants were classified as cases of psychogenic illness. 22 (14.1%) of them fulfilled diagnostic criteria for depressive disorder. Depressive patients were physically more impaired, reported rare and less satisfying social contacts and different coping strategies than the other study participants. With regard to their biographical reconstructions, cases reported more experienced bürden and less experienced support. In discrimination analysis, 78.4% of the study participants were correctly classified as cases vs. non-cases of psychogenic illness by one biographical variable and two coping strategies. Results are discussed as risk factors or protective factors for psychic health in old age considering their clinical relevance.

Explore related subjects

BiographyImpairment Score (IS)Old agePsychogenic illnessRisk factorEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Schneider, G Heuft, A Kruse. 1999. [Not Available].. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.1999.45.3.218

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

[Mental work: the search for a precise way to measure psychic activity]

Presents three brief case studies to show how cognition and psychic activity were explored as energetic and economic transactions in a variety of experimental settings. First, in the 1870's German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin began a search for an objective measurement of cognitive performance in which he engaged for several decades. His investigations resulted in a graphic representation of cognitive efficiency, the Arbeitscurve, delineating numbers of additions per time interval in close resemblance to representations of machine efficiency. Second, at the turn of the century American nutrition scientist and agronomist Wilbur Olin Atwater convinced himself in a series of precision measurements that the human motor was a perfectly closed input-output system and that any mental surplus in the form of cognitive energy transformation did not count as contradictions to the principle of the conservation of energy. Third, at the beginning of the 20th century and on the basis of Atwater's results, German psychiatrist Hans Berger stipulated a special form of psychic energy for mediating between the principle of the conservation of energy and mental causality. Berger attempted to quantify psychic energy as one factor of brain metabolism. In the three cases of precision investigations into psychic life presented here, the experimental space of psychophysiology turned mental activity into a form of machine-like behavior.

Biography↗
PubMed2000

[Not Available].

The intention of the study is the empirical differentiation between "mature" and "immature" (borderline-) hysterics. 366 inpatients of the Department of Psychoso-matic Medicine of the Central Institute of Mental Health in Mannheim (university of Heidelberg) were diagnosed with regard to the existence of hysterical personality traits. 146 patients shared the criteria of the DOPSY-system for hysteria. This group was divided by assistance of the Bordcrlinc-Syndromc-Index (BSI) into a subgroup of n = 79 "mature" and a subgroup of n=67 "immature" Borderline hysterics. The distri-bution was validated by the Freiburger Personality inventure (FPI). Both groups are similar referring to age, gender and schooleducation. On the level of symptomatology we found the same feature of diagnoses in the area F40-45 in the ICD-10. Two third of the patients with hysterical personality traits have got an additional classification of personality disorder, but only 48% in the group of mature hysterics and 37% in the group of immature hysterics were classified by experienced psychoanalysists as his-trionic personality disorder (F60.4, ICD-10). With respect to risk factors in the life history we found that mature hysterics much more often were characterized by a loss of father in the first three years and the position of the eldest (and sometimes only) child. The results pointed to distinct developmental lines, which suggest, that the two hysterical groups can be differentiated by the style of coping and defense.

Biography↗