Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11766443

Setting the standard.

Abstract

Beginning Oct. 16, 2002, hospitals will no longer be able to submit claims to third party payers electronically unless the claims are in standard format. As a result, claims formerly submitted in UB92 (currently the defacto institutional claims standard) or other traditional formats will need to be submitted in X12N 837, which is a standard developed by the Accredited Standards Committee of the American National Standards Institute. This requirement is yet another challenge for hospitals resulting from the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A B Wachler, A K Fehn. Setting the standard.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11766443/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medical Image Resource Center--making electronic teaching files from PACS.

A picture archive and communications system (PACS) is a rich source of images and data suitable for creating electronic teaching files (ETF). However, the potential for PACS to support nonclinical applications has not been fully realized: at present there is no mechanism for PACS to identify and store teaching files; neither is there a standardized method for sharing such teaching images. The Medical Image Resource Center (MIRC) is a new central image repository that defines standards for data exchange among different centers. We developed an ETF server that retrieves digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) images from PACS, and enables users to create teaching files that conform to the new MIRC schema. We test-populated our ETF server with illustrative images from the clinical case load of the National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore. Together, PACS and MIRC have the potential to benefit radiology teaching and research.

Computer Communication Networks↗

Performance analysis of an iSCSI-based unified storage network.

In this paper, we introduced a novel storage architecture "Unified Storage Network", which merges NAC(Network Attached Channel) and SAN(Storage Area Network), and provides the file I/O services as NAS devices and provides the block I/O services as SAN. To overcome the drawbacks from FC, we employ iSCSI to implement the USN(Unified Storage Network). To evaluate whether iSCSI is more suitable for implementing the USN, we analyze iSCSI protocol and compare it with FC protocol from several components of a network protocol which impact the performance of the network. From the analysis and comparison, we can conclude that the iSCSI is more suitable for implementing the storage network than the FC under condition of the wide-area network. At last, we designed two groups of experiments carefully.

Computer Communication Networks↗