Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11759358

Supportive work environments for nursing faculty.

Abstract

Whereas most of the concern about increasingly stressful work environments has focused on acute-care hospitals, the academic healthcare environment is not immune. Faculty, staff, and students in schools of nursing report similar stressors. Pressures from managed care, personnel shortages, and unceasing change are affecting the academic environment and yielding stressful, dysfunctional, and occasionally abusive settings here as well. This article describes the role of the dean in creating a healthy work environment in which students can learn and faculty can teach and do research. Future nurses are introduced to critical care as students, and the learning environment significantly influences them. Graduate students in critical care can experience encounters that range from supportive to obstructive. Knowing what is reasonable to expect from a dean and faculty should help students in critical care sort out the issues if they are experiencing an abusive situation, and what options they might pursue.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E B Rudy. 2001. Supportive work environments for nursing faculty.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00044067-200108000-00008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗