Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 1173009

Corticosteroids and bioavailability.

Abstract

This presentation has attempted to provide a brief view of the importance of bioavailability and bioequivalence to those physicians who use corticosteroids. In particular it emphasizes that in vitro tests may not be reliable for predicting variability between formulations and, more importantly, cannot take the place of a bioavailability study. The implication would seen clear: namely, that a manufacturer who wishes to market a formulation similar to that already available and found to be acceptable clinically cannot rely on merely matching the standard formulation with in vitro tests but should substantiate that his formulation is, indeed, bioequivalent to the standard. In addition, data have been presented that clearly suggest the importance of bioavailability methodology as a new and useful pharmacological tool. In conclusion, as far as the bioavailability of corticosteroids in the marketplace is concerned, an old adage may be paraphrased: "If you don't know your bioavailability, know your manufacturer."

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S S Stubbs. 1975. Corticosteroids and bioavailability.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1173009/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Original brands and generic preparations].

BACKGROUND: Modern guidelines of drug approval aim at interchangeability of drugs containing the same active ingredients. Therapeutic equivalence of original and generic drugs is assumed as soon as bioequivalence is documented. For this to be accepted, first, pharmaceutical equivalence must prevail (the same amount of active substances in the same dosage forms) and, second, differences in bioavailabilities must not exceed certain limits. Drastic deviations from the original--not infrequent in the past--have become rare under the new sets of rules. CURRENT RELEVANCE: However, there is still room for sometimes stunning discrepancies between approved drugs, since the current procedures--mainly for economic reasons--do not cover some potentially relevant aspects: Usually, studies are performed on young, healthy, mostly male volunteers; possible effects of meals on bioavailability are not investigated and, after approval of a drug, maintenance of attested quality--as with all manufacturers--is not monitored. Moreover, the tolerated deviations from the bioavailability of the original drug are quite large; with certain substances, a change from the generic drug with the lowest bioavailability to that with the highest could mean transition from low efficacy to a toxic dose level. Documented examples include carbamazepine, phenytoin, levothyroxin, verapamil, and aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, even today's sophisticated rules do not suffice to cover all eventualities. In particular, drugs with a narrow therapeutic range require close scrutiny in product selection. Pertinent are drug documentation as well as the distinguishing features of the respective manufacturers, mainly scientific support and record of product reliability. Besides the sometimes insufficient official documentation, the internet has been gaining importance as a source of information.

Biological Availability

Dietary folate equivalents: interpretation and application.

The 1998 Dietary Reference Intakes express the new Recommended Dietary Allowances for folate in dietary folate equivalents ("DFEs"), which account for differences in the absorption of naturally occurring food folate and the more bioavailable synthetic folic acid. The quantity of dietary folate equivalents occurring naturally in food equals the micrograms of folate as reported, and the dietary folate equivalents provided by fortified foods equal the micrograms of food folate plus 1.7 times the micrograms of added folic acid. Currently, the use of dietary folate equivalents is recommended for planning and evaluating the adequacy of people's folate intake. As a result of new US Food and Drug Administration regulations, folic acid has been added to enriched cereal grains and thus affects hundreds of food products. To help dietetics professionals plan and evaluate diets that include enriched cereal grain products, we estimated the dietary folate equivalent content of a selection of foods using data supplied by the US Department of Agriculture and grouped the foods by dietary folate equivalent content.

Biological Availability